Banach Fixed-Point Theorem
Contents |
Theorem
Suppose $(M, d)$ is a complete metric space, and suppose $f:M\to M$ is a contraction, i.e.
- $d(f(x), f(y)) \le q d(x, y)$
for some $q \in [0 .. 1)$ and each $x, y\in M$.
Then there exists a unique fixed point of $f$.
Also known as the Contraction Mapping Theorem.
Proof
Uniqueness
Suppose $f$ has two distinct fixed points $p_1, p_2\in M$. Then
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle qd(f(p_1), f(p_2))\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle qd(p_1, p_2)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | by definition of fixed point | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\ge\) | \(\displaystyle d(f(p_1), f(p_2))\) | \(\displaystyle \) | by the condition on $f$ |
which is only possible if $d(f(p_1), f(p_2)) = 0$ since $q < 1$.
But since $d$ is a metric, this means that $f(p_1) = f(p_2)$ and so $p_1 = p_2$.
Existence
We find a fixed point by selecting an arbitrary member of $M$ and repeatedly taking the image under $f$.
Take any $a\in M$ and define $a_0 = a, a_{n+1} = f(a_n)$ for $n \in \N$. Then by assumption, $d(a_{n+2}, a_{n+1}) \leq qd(a_{n+1}, a_n)$.
Therefore
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle d(a_{n+k}, a_n)\) | \(\le\) | \(\displaystyle qd(a_{n+k-1}, a_{n-1})\) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\le\) | \(\displaystyle q^2d(a_{n+k-2}, a_{n-2})\) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\vdots\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\le\) | \(\displaystyle q^nd(a_{n+k-n}, a_{n-n})\) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle q^nd(a_k, a_0)\) | \(\displaystyle \) |
for each $n, k\in\N$, from which it follows that $d(a_{n+1}, a_n) \leq q^nd(a_1, a_0)$.
So for any $n > m$:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle d(a_n, a_m)\) | \(\le\) | \(\displaystyle \sum_{i=m}^{n-1}d(a_{i+1}, a_i)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | since $d$ is a metric | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\le\) | \(\displaystyle \sum_{i=m}^{n-1}q^id(a_1, a_0)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | by the above | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle q^md(a_1, a_0)\cdot\sum_{i=0}^{n-m-1}q^i\) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\le\) | \(\displaystyle q^md(a_1, a_0)\cdot\sum_{i=0}^\infty q^i\) | \(\displaystyle \) | since $q > 0$ | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \frac{q^md(a_1, a_0)}{1 - q}\) | \(\displaystyle \) | by Sum of Infinite Geometric Progression |
This last quantity can be made arbitrarily small for all sufficiently large choices of $m$, so the sequence $(a_n)_{n\in\N}$ is Cauchy.
Therefore, by assumption that the metric space is complete, $\exists a\in M : d(a, a_n)\to 0$.
Finally:
- $d(a, f(a)) \leq d(a, a_{n+1}) + d(a_{n+1}, f(a)) \leq d(a, a_{n+1}) + qd(a, a_n) \to 0 + q\cdot 0 = 0$
So $a = f(a)\ $.
$\blacksquare$
Source of Name
This entry was named for Stefan Banach.