Boundedness of Nth Powers
Contents |
Theorem
Let $x \in \R$ be a real number.
Let set $S = \left\{{x^n: n \in \N}\right\}$.
Then:
- If $x > 1$ then $S$ is unbounded above.
- If $0 < x < 1$ then $\inf S = 0$ and $\sup S = 1$, where $\inf S$ and $\sup S$ are the infimum and supremum of $S$ respectively.
- If $x = 1$, then of course $x^n = 1$ for all $n \in \N$.
Proof
$x$ greater than $1$
First, let $x > 1$.
Suppose $S$ were bounded above.
Then $S$ has a supremum $B$.
As $x > 1$, it follows that $\dfrac B x < B$ and so therefore $\dfrac B x$ can not be an upper bound.
Therefore $\exists n \in \N: x^n > \dfrac B x \implies x^{n+1} > B$.
So $B$ can not be an upper bound.
From that contradiction it can be concluded that $S$ can not have an upper bound and therefore $S$ is unbounded above.
$\blacksquare$
$x$ less than $1$
Now suppose $0 < x < 1$.
When $n = 0$ it follows that $x^n = 1$ and so $\sup S \ge 1$.
Now let $x^k \in S$.
Then as $x < 1$, we have $x^{k+1} < x^k$ from Real Number Ordering is Compatible with Multiplication.
So $\forall x \in S: x \le 1$ hence it follows that $\sup S = 1$.
Also, note that as $x > 0$, it follows again by Real Number Ordering is Compatible with Multiplication that $\forall x \in S: x \ge 0$.
Therefore $x$ is a lower bound of $S$.
Now suppose $h > 0$ is also a lower bound of $S$.
Then $\forall n \in \N: x^n \ge h$.
Then $\displaystyle \forall n \in \N: \left({\frac 1 x}\right)^n \le \frac 1 h$
But as $0 < x < 1$ it follows that $\dfrac 1 x > 1$.
Thus $\dfrac 1 h$ is an upper bound for $\displaystyle \left\{{\left({\frac 1 x}\right)^n: n \in \N}\right\}$ which has been shown to be unbounded above.
Therefore there can be no such lower bound $h > 0$ of $S$.
Hence $\inf S = 0$.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- K.G. Binmore: Mathematical Analysis: A Straightforward Approach (1977)... (previous)... (next): $\S 3.6 \ (2)$