Condition for an Edge to be a Bridge
Contents |
Theorem
Let $G = \left({V, E}\right)$ be a connected graph.
Let $e \in E$ be an edge of $G$.
Then $e$ is a bridge iff $e$ does not lie on any circuit of $G$.
Proof
Necessary Condition
Let $e$ be a bridge of $G$.
Let $G \setminus e$ denote the set difference of $G$ with $e$, that is, $G$ with $e$ removed.
Suppose, in the hope of generating a contradiction, that $e = uv$ and $e$ lies on a circuit, say $C = \left({u, v, w, \ldots, x, u}\right)$.
Thus $G \setminus e$ contains a $u-v$ path, that is, $\left({v, x, \ldots, w, u}\right)$.
So $u$ is connected to $v$ in $G \setminus e$.
Now we need to show that $G \setminus e$ is connected.
Let $u_1, v_1 \in V$.
Since $G$ is connected, there is a $u_1-v_1$ path $P$ in $G$.
If $e \notin P$, then $P$ is also a path in $G \setminus e$ and $u_1$ is connected to $v_1$ in $G \setminus e$.
On the other hand, suppose $e \notin P$.
Then $P$ can be expressed as $\left({u_1, \ldots, u, v, \ldots, v_1}\right)$ or $\left({u_1, \ldots, v, u, \ldots, v_1}\right)$.
In the first case, $u_1$ is connected to $u$ and $v$ is connected to $v_1$ in $G \setminus e$.
In the second case, $u_1$ is connected to $v$ and $u$ is connected to $v_1$ in $G \setminus e$.
But we have already established that $u$ is connected to $v$ in $G \setminus e$.
But Graph Connectedness is an Equivalence Relation, and hence $u_1$ is connected to $v_1$.
So, if $e$ lies on a circuit, then $G \setminus e$ is connected.
This contradicts the stipulation that $e$ is a bridge.
Hence $e$ can not lie on a circuit.
Sufficient Condition
Let $e = uv$ be an edge which does not lie on a circuit of $G$.
Suppose, in the hope of generating a contradiction, that $e$ is not a bridge.
Then $G \setminus e$ is connected, and thus there is a $u-v$ path $P$ in $G \setminus e$.
But $P$ together with $e = uv$ produces a circuit containing $e$.
This contradicts the stipulation that $e$ does not lie on a circuit of $G$.
Hence $e$ is a bridge.
$\blacksquare$
Note
This result is usually given that:
As a cycle is by definition a circuit, the result as given in this entry is slightly stronger.
Sources
- Gary Chartrand: Introductory Graph Theory (1977): $\S 2.4$: Theorem $2.5$