Conjunction therefore Disjunction of Conjunctions with Complements

From ProofWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Theorem

$p \land q \vdash \left({p \land r}\right) \lor \left({q \land \neg r}\right)$


Proof

Proof by Natural deduction

This is proved by the Tableau method:


$p \land q \vdash \left({p \land r}\right) \lor \left({q \land \neg r}\right)$
Line Pool Formula Rule Depends upon
1 1 $p \land q$ P (None)
2 - $r \lor \neg r$ LEM (None)
3 1 $p$ $\land \mathcal E_1$ 1
4 1 $q$ $\land \mathcal E_2$ 1
5 5 $r$ A (None)
6 1, 5 $p \land r$ $\land \mathcal I$ 1, 5
7 1, 5 $\left({p \land r}\right) \lor \left({q \land \neg r}\right)$ $\lor \mathcal I_1$ 6
8 8 $\neg r$ A (None)
9 1, 8 $q \land \neg r$ $\land \mathcal I$ 4, 8
10 1, 8 $\left({p \land r}\right) \lor \left({q \land \neg r}\right)$ $\lor \mathcal I_2$ 9
11 1 $\left({p \land r}\right) \lor \left(q \land \neg r\right)$ $\lor \mathcal E$ 2, 5-7, 8-10 The assumptions at 5 and 8 are discharged.

$\blacksquare$

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
ProofWiki.org
ToDo
Toolbox
Google AdSense