Conjunction therefore Disjunction of Conjunctions with Complements
From ProofWiki
Theorem
- $p \land q \vdash \left({p \land r}\right) \lor \left({q \land \neg r}\right)$
Proof
Proof by Natural deduction
This is proved by the Tableau method:
| Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | $p \land q$ | P | (None) | ||
| 2 | - | $r \lor \neg r$ | LEM | (None) | ||
| 3 | 1 | $p$ | $\land \mathcal E_1$ | 1 | ||
| 4 | 1 | $q$ | $\land \mathcal E_2$ | 1 | ||
| 5 | 5 | $r$ | A | (None) | ||
| 6 | 1, 5 | $p \land r$ | $\land \mathcal I$ | 1, 5 | ||
| 7 | 1, 5 | $\left({p \land r}\right) \lor \left({q \land \neg r}\right)$ | $\lor \mathcal I_1$ | 6 | ||
| 8 | 8 | $\neg r$ | A | (None) | ||
| 9 | 1, 8 | $q \land \neg r$ | $\land \mathcal I$ | 4, 8 | ||
| 10 | 1, 8 | $\left({p \land r}\right) \lor \left({q \land \neg r}\right)$ | $\lor \mathcal I_2$ | 9 | ||
| 11 | 1 | $\left({p \land r}\right) \lor \left(q \land \neg r\right)$ | $\lor \mathcal E$ | 2, 5-7, 8-10 | The assumptions at 5 and 8 are discharged. |
$\blacksquare$