De Morgan's Laws (Set Theory)/Proof by Induction
Contents |
Theorem
Let $\mathbb T = \left\{{T_i: i \in I}\right\}$, where each $T_i$ is a set and $I$ is some finite indexing set.
Then:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcap_{i \in I} T_i = \bigcup_{i \in I} \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcup_{i \in I} T_i = \bigcap_{i \in I} \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
Proof
Let the cardinality $\left|{I}\right|$ of the indexing set $I$ be $n$.
Then by the definition of cardinality, it follows that $I \cong \N^*_n$ and we can express the propositions:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcap_{i \in I} T_i = \bigcup_{i \in I} \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcup_{i \in I} T_i = \bigcap_{i \in I} \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
as:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcap_{i = 1}^n T_i = \bigcup_{i = 1}^n \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcup_{i = 1}^n T_i = \bigcap_{i = 1}^n \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
The proof of these is more amenable to proof by Principle of Mathematical Induction.
First result
For all $n \in \N^*$, let $P \left({n}\right)$ be the proposition:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcap_{i = 1}^n T_i = \bigcup_{i = 1}^n \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
- $P(1)$ is true, as this just says $S \setminus T_1 = S \setminus T_1$.
First result: Base Case
- $P(2)$ is the case:
- $S \setminus \left({T_1 \cap T_2}\right) = \left({S \setminus T_1}\right) \cup \left({S \setminus T_2}\right)$
which has been proved.
This is our basis for the induction.
First result: Induction Hypothesis
Now we need to show that, if $P \left({k}\right)$ is true, where $k \ge 2$, then it logically follows that $P \left({k+1}\right)$ is true.
So this is our induction hypothesis:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcap_{i = 1}^k T_i = \bigcup_{i = 1}^k \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
First result: Induction Step
Now we need to show:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcap_{i = 1}^{k+1} T_i = \bigcup_{i = 1}^{k+1} \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
This is our induction step:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcap_{i = 1}^{k+1} T_i\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle S \setminus \left({\bigcap_{i = 1}^k T_i \cap T_{k+1} }\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Intersection is Associative | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({S \setminus \bigcap_{i = 1}^k T_i}\right) \cup \left({S \setminus T_{k+1} }\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Base case | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({\bigcup_{i = 1}^k \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)}\right) \cup \left({S \setminus T_{k+1} }\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Induction hypothesis | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \bigcup_{i = 1}^{k+1} \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Union is Associative |
So $P \left({k}\right) \implies P \left({k+1}\right)$ and the result follows by the Principle of Mathematical Induction.
Therefore:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcap_{i = 1}^n T_i = \bigcup_{i = 1}^n \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
i.e.
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcap_{i \in I} T_i = \bigcup_{i \in I} \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
$\blacksquare$
Second result
For all $n \in \N^*$, let $P \left({n}\right)$ be the proposition:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcup_{i = 1}^n T_i = \bigcap_{i = 1}^n \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$.
- $P(1)$ is true, as this just says $S \setminus T_1 = S \setminus T_1$.
Second result: Base Case
- $P(2)$ is the case:
- $S \setminus \left({T_1 \cup T_2}\right) = \left({S \setminus T_1}\right) \cap \left({S \setminus T_2}\right)$
which has been proved.
This is our basis for the induction.
Second result: Induction Hypothesis
Now we need to show that, if $P \left({k}\right)$ is true, where $k \ge 2$, then it logically follows that $P \left({k+1}\right)$ is true.
So this is our induction hypothesis:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcup_{i = 1}^k T_i = \bigcap_{i = 1}^k \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
Second result: Induction Step
Now we need to show:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcup_{i = 1}^{k+1} T_i = \bigcap_{i = 1}^{k+1} \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
This is our induction step:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcup_{i = 1}^{k+1} T_i\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle S \setminus \left({\bigcup_{i = 1}^k T_i \cup T_{k+1} }\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Union is Associative | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({S \setminus \bigcup_{i = 1}^k T_i}\right) \cap \left({S \setminus T_{k+1} }\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Base case | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({\bigcap_{i = 1}^k \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)}\right) \cap \left({S \setminus T_{k+1} }\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Induction hypothesis | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \bigcap_{i = 1}^{k+1} \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Intersection is Associative |
So $P \left({k}\right) \implies P \left({k+1}\right)$ and the result follows by the Principle of Mathematical Induction.
Therefore:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcup_{i = 1}^n T_i = \bigcap_{i = 1}^n \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
i.e.:
- $\displaystyle S \setminus \bigcup_{i \in I} T_i = \bigcap_{i \in I} \left({S \setminus T_i}\right)$
$\blacksquare$