Definition:Relative Complement
Contents |
Definition
Let $S$ be a set , and let $T \subseteq S$, that is: let $T$ be a subset of $S$.
Then the set difference $S \setminus T$ can be written $\complement_S \left({T}\right)$, and is called the relative complement of $T$ in $S$, or the complement of $T$ relative to $S$.
Thus:
- $\complement_S \left({T}\right) = \left\{{x \in S : x \notin T}\right\}$
Also known as
Some authors call this the complement and use the term relative complement for the set difference $S \setminus T$ when the stipulation $T \subseteq S$ is not required.
Different notations for $\complement_S \left({T}\right)$ include variants of the $\complement$:
- $\mathcal C_S \left({T}\right)$
- $c_S \left({T}\right)$
- $C_S \left({T}\right)$
- $\mathrm C_S \left({T}\right)$
or sometimes:
- $T\ ^c \left({S}\right)$
- $T\ ^\complement \left({S}\right)$
... and sometimes the brackets are omitted:
- $C_S T$
If the superset $S$ is implicit, then it can be omitted: $\complement \left({T}\right)$ etc. See the notation for set complement.
Also see
- Results about Relative Complement can be found here.
Linguistic Note
Beware the spelling of complement. If you spell it compliment it means something completely different.
An example of a relative compliment is: "Auntie thinks you're clever."
Sources
- Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory (1960)... (previous)... (next): $\S 5$: Complements and Powers
- Steven A. Gaal: Point Set Topology (1964)... (previous)... (next): Introduction to Set Theory: $1$. Elementary Operations on Sets
- J.A. Green: Sets and Groups (1965)... (previous)... (next): $\S 1.6$
- Seth Warner: Modern Algebra (1965)... (previous)... (next): $\S 3$
- T.S. Blyth: Set Theory and Abstract Algebra (1975): $\S 1$
- Thomas A. Whitelaw: An Introduction to Abstract Algebra (1978)... (previous)... (next): $\S 6$
- H. Jerome Keisler and Joel Robbin: Mathematical Logic and Computability (1996): Appendix $\text{A}.2$
- René L. Schilling: Measures, Integrals and Martingales (2005)... (previous)... (next) $\S 2$