Definition of Polynomial from Polynomial Ring
Theorem
Let $R$ be a ring with unity.
Let $R \left[{x}\right]$ be a polynomial over $R$ in $x$.
Then $R \left[{x}\right]$ is a ring.
Proof
Let $P \left[{R}\right]$ be the polynomial ring over $R$.
Consider the injection $\phi: R \to P \left[{R}\right]$ defined as:
- $\forall r \in R: \phi \left({r}\right) = \left \langle{r, 0, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle$
It is easily checked that $\phi$ is a ring monomorphism.
So the set $\left\{{\left \langle{r, 0, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle: r \in R}\right\}$ is a subring of $P \left[{R}\right]$ which is isomorphic to $R$.
So we identify $r \in R$ with the sequence $\left \langle{r, 0, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle$.
Next we note that $P \left[{R}\right]$ contains the element $\left \langle{0, 1, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle$ which we can call $x$.
From the definition of ring product on the polynomial ring over $R$, we have that:
- $x^2 = \left \langle{0, 1, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle^2 = \left \langle{0, 0, 1, 0, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle$
- $x^3 = \left \langle{0, 1, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle^3 = \left \langle{0, 0, 0, 1, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle$
... and in general:
- $x^n = \left \langle{0, 1, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle^n = \left \langle{0, \ldots (n) \ldots, 0, 1, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle$
for all $n \ge 1$.
Hence we see that:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \left \langle{r_0, r_1, \ldots, r_n, 0, \ldots \ldots}\right \rangle\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left \langle{r_0, 0, 0, \ldots \ldots}\right \rangle \left \langle{1, 0, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(+\) | \(\displaystyle \left \langle{r_1, 0, 0, \ldots \ldots}\right \rangle \left \langle{0, 1, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(+\) | \(\displaystyle \cdots\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(+\) | \(\displaystyle \left \langle{r_n, 0, 0, \ldots \ldots}\right \rangle \left \langle{0, \ldots (n) \ldots, 0, 1, 0, \ldots}\right \rangle\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(+\) | \(\displaystyle r_0 + r_1 x + r_2 x^2 + \ldots + r_n x^n\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) |
So by construction, $R \left[{x}\right]$ is seen to be equivalent to $P \left[{R}\right]$.
But $R \left[{x}\right]$ is a ring, and so $P \left[{R}\right]$ is one also.
$\blacksquare$
It can also be shown that this proof works for the general ring whether it be a ring with unity or not.
Sources
- C.R.J. Clapham: Introduction to Abstract Algebra (1969)... (previous)... (next): $\S 6.25$
- B. Hartley and T.O. Hawkes: Rings, Modules and Linear Algebra (1970): $\S 3.1$