Dominates is Equivalent to Subset
Contents |
Theorem
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets.
Then $S$ is dominated by $T$ iff $S$ is equivalent to a subset of $T$:
- $S \le T \iff S \sim T_1 \subseteq T$
Thus, the cardinality of $S$ is at most as large as that of $T$.
The use of the term large is justified by the fact that Dominates is an Ordering.
Proof
Let $S \le T$.
Then by definition, $\exists f: S \to T$ injective.
From Image is Subset of Codomain, $f \left({S}\right) \subseteq T$.
Now consider the mapping $f_1: S \to f \left({S}\right)$, defined as:
- $\forall s \in S: f_1 \left({s}\right) = f \left({s}\right)$
Clearly $f_1: S \to f \left({S}\right)$ is a bijection.
By definition of equivalent sets:
- $S \sim f \left({S}\right) \subseteq T$
$\Box$
Let $S \sim S_1 \subseteq T$.
Then by definition, $\exists f: S \to S_1$ is bijective.
Now consider the mapping $f_1: S \to f \left({S}\right)$, defined as:
- $\forall s \in S: f_1 \left({s}\right) = f \left({s}\right)$
Clearly $f_1: S \to T$ is injective.
Thus $S \le T$, by definition.
$\blacksquare$
Alternative treatments
Some sources use this equivalence to define dominance.
Also see
Sources
- Steven A. Gaal: Point Set Topology (1964)... (previous)... (next): Introduction to Set Theory: $2$. Set Theoretical Equivalence and Denumerability