Equivalence of Congruence Definitions
Contents |
Theorem
The definitions of congruence (in the context of Number Theory):
- $(1) \qquad x \equiv y \pmod z \iff \left({x, y}\right) \in \left\{{\left({x, y}\right) \in \R \times \R: \exists k \in \Z: x = y + k z}\right\}$
- $(2) \qquad x \equiv y \pmod z \iff x \mod z = y \mod z$
- $(3) \qquad x \equiv y \pmod z \iff \exists k \in \Z: x - y = k z$
... are equivalent.
Integer definition
Also, if $x, y, z$ are all integers, the definition:
- $x \equiv y \pmod z \iff z \backslash \left({x - y}\right)$
is likewise equivalent to the other given definitions.
Proof
Let $x_1, x_2, z \in \R$.
Let $x_1 \equiv x_2 \pmod z$ in the sense of Definition by Equivalence Relation.
That is, let $\mathcal R_z$ be the relation on the set of all $x, y \in \R$:
- $\mathcal R_z = \left\{{\left({x, y}\right) \in \R \times \R: \exists k \in \Z: x = y + k z}\right\}$
Let $\left({x_1, x_2}\right) \in \mathcal R_z$.
Then by definition, $\exists k \in \Z: x_1 = x_2 + k z$.
So, by definition of the modulo operation, we have:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle x_1 \mod z\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({x_2 + kz}\right) - z \left \lfloor {\frac {x_2 + kz} z}\right \rfloor\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({x_2 + kz}\right) - z \left \lfloor {\frac {x_2} z + k}\right \rfloor\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \left({x_2 + kz}\right) - z \left \lfloor {\frac {x_2} z}\right \rfloor + k z\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle x_2 - z \left \lfloor {\frac {x_2} z}\right \rfloor\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle x_2 \mod z\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) |
So:
- $x_1 \equiv x_2 \pmod z$
in the sense of Definition by Modulo Operation.
Now let $x_1 \equiv x_2 \pmod z$ in the sense of Definition by Modulo Operation.
That is, :$x_1 \equiv x_2 (\bmod\, z) \iff x_1 \mod z = x_2 \mod z$.
Let $z = 0$.
Then by definition, $x_1 \mod 0 = x_1$ and $x_2 \mod 0 = x_2$.
So as $x_1 \mod 0 = x_2 \mod 0$ we have that $x_1 = x_2$.
So $x_1 - x_2 = 0 = 0.z$ and so $x_1 \equiv x_2 \pmod z$ in the sense of Definition by Integral Multiple.
Now suppose $z \ne 0$.
Then from definition of the modulo operation:
- $x_1 \mod z = x_1 - z \left \lfloor {\dfrac {x_1} z}\right \rfloor$
- $x_2 \mod z = x_2 - z \left \lfloor {\dfrac {x_2} z}\right \rfloor$
Thus:
- $x_1 - z \left \lfloor {\dfrac {x_1} z}\right \rfloor = x_2 - z \left \lfloor {\dfrac {x_2} z}\right \rfloor$
and so:
- $x_1 - x_2 = z \left({\left \lfloor {\dfrac {x_1} z}\right \rfloor - \left \lfloor {\dfrac {x_2} z}\right \rfloor}\right)$
From the definition of the floor function, we see that both $\left \lfloor {\dfrac {x_1} z}\right \rfloor$ and $\left \lfloor {\dfrac {x_2} z}\right \rfloor$ are integers.
Therefore, so is $\left \lfloor {\dfrac {x_1} z}\right \rfloor - \left \lfloor {\dfrac {x_2} z}\right \rfloor$ an integer.
So $\exists k \in \Z: x_1 - x_2 = k z$.
Thus $x_1 - x_2 = k z$ and:
- $x_1 \equiv x_2 \pmod z$
in the sense of Definition by Integral Multiple.
Now let $x_1 \equiv x_2 \pmod z$ in the sense of Definition by Integral Multiple.
That is, $\exists k \in \Z: x_1 - x_2 = k z$.
Then $x_1 = x_2 + k z$ and so $\left({x_1, x_2}\right) \in \mathcal R_z$ where:
- $\mathcal R_z = \left\{{\left({x, y}\right) \in \R \times \R: \exists k \in \Z: x = y + k z}\right\}$
and so
- $x_1 \equiv x_2 \pmod z$
in the sense of Definition by Equivalence Relation.
So all three definitions are equivalent: $(1) \implies (2) \implies (3) \implies (1)$.
$\blacksquare$
Proof for Integer Definition
By definition of divisor, we have that:
- $z \backslash x - y \iff x - y = k z$
which is equivalent to the third definition.
$\blacksquare$