Image of an Ultrafilter is an Ultrafilter
Theorem
Let $X, Y$ be two sets, $f: X \to Y$ a mapping and $\mathcal F$ an ultrafilter on $X$.
Then the image filter $f \left({\mathcal F}\right)$ is an ultrafilter on $Y$.
Proof
From Image Filter is a Filter, we have that $\mathcal F$ is a filter on $Y$.
Let $\mathcal G$ be a filter on $Y$ such that $f \left({\mathcal F}\right) \subseteq \mathcal G$.
We have to show that $f \left({\mathcal F}\right) = \mathcal G$.
Let $U \in \mathcal G$.
Assume that $U \notin f \left({\mathcal F}\right)$.
By the definition of $f \left({\mathcal F}\right)$ this implies that $f^{-1}(U) \not \in \mathcal F$.
By the equivalent definitions of ultrafilters we thus know that:
- $V := X \setminus f^{-1} \left({U}\right) \in \mathcal F$
Because $V \subseteq f^{-1} \left({f \left({V}\right)}\right)$ it follows that $f^{-1}\left({f \left({V}\right)}\right) \in \mathcal F$ and thus also $f \left({V}\right) \in f \left({\mathcal F}\right)$.
By assumption we have $f \left({\mathcal F}\right) \subseteq \mathcal G$, thus $f \left({V}\right) \in \mathcal G$.
But:
- $f \left({V}\right) \cap U = f \left({X \setminus f^{-1} \left({U}\right)}\right) \cap U = \varnothing \notin \mathcal G$
Thus $\mathcal G$ is not a filter, a contradiction to our assumptions.
Thus:
- $U \in f \left({\mathcal F}\right)$ and therefore $f \left({\mathcal F}\right) = \mathcal G$
Hence $f \left({\mathcal F}\right)$ is an ultrafilter.
$\blacksquare$