Implications of Stokes' Theorem

From ProofWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Please don't anybody else add anything to this page. You'll be wasting your time as this is all going to be restructured.

Remember that this is not WikiPedia. The point of this site is not to cram as much as possible into one big page.

Theorem

Stokes' Theorem implies all of the following results:

Proof

Classical Stokes' Theorem

We note that given $f_1,f_2,f_3 :\R^3 \to \R$, $f_1dx + f_2dy +f_3dz$ is a 1-form defined on a surface. Since we are integrating over the boundary of a surface, which is a 1-manifold, we may use the general Stokes' theorem:

$\oint_{\partial S} f_1dx+f_2dy+f_3dz = \iint_S d(f_1dx+f_2dy+f_3dz) =$

$\iint_S \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x} dx \wedge dx + \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial y} dy \wedge dx + \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial z} dz \wedge dx$

$+ \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x} dx \wedge dy + \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial y} dy \wedge dy + \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial z} dz \wedge dy$

$+ \frac{\partial f_3}{\partial x} dx \wedge dz + \frac{\partial f_3}{\partial y} dy \wedge dz + \frac{\partial f_3}{\partial z} dz \wedge dz$

$ = \iint \left({\frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial y} }\right) dx \wedge dy + \left({\frac{\partial f_3}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial f_2}{\partial z} }\right) dy \wedge dz + \left({\frac{\partial f_1}{\partial z} - \frac{\partial f_3}{\partial x} }\right) dz \wedge dx$

If we define $\mathbf{F}:\R^3 \to \R^3$ as $\mathbf{F} = f_1 \mathbf{e}_1 + f_2 \mathbf{e}_2 + \mathbf{e}_3$, we recognize this expression as $\nabla \times \mathbf{F}$, with $dy\wedge dz$ replacing $\mathbf{e}_1, dx \wedge dz$ replacing $\mathbf{e}_2$, and $dx \wedge dy$ replacing $\mathbf{e}_3$.

Green's Theorem

We note that given $A,B :\R^2 \to \R$, $Adx + Bdy$ is a 1-form defined on some open set $U \subset \R^2$. Since we are integrating a 1-form on $\partial U$, a 1-manifold, we may use the general Stoke's theorem:

$\oint_{\partial U} \left({ Adx+Bdy }\right) = \iint_U d \left({Adx+Bdy }\right) = \iint_U \left({ \frac{\partial A}{\partial x} dx \wedge dx + \frac{\partial A}{\partial y} dy \wedge dx + \frac{\partial B}{\partial x} dx \wedge dy + \frac{\partial B}{\partial y} dy \wedge dy }\right) \ $

$= \iint_U \left({ 0 - \frac{\partial A}{\partial y} dx \wedge dy + \frac{\partial B}{\partial x} dx \wedge dy + 0 }\right) = \iint_U \left({ \frac{\partial B}{\partial x} - \frac{ \partial A}{\partial y} }\right) dxdy \ $

Divergence Theorem

We note that the expression $\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n}dS$ is a 2-form, since it takes two vectors ($F$ and $n$) and outputs a scalar; or, less formally, $\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n}dS = $ (scalar)(area 2-form) = 2-form. Since we are integrating this expression over the boundary of a region in three space, which is a 2-manifold, we may use the general Stokes' theorem:

$\iint\limits_{\partial U} \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{n}\ dS = \iiint_U d \left({ \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{n}\ dS }\right) = \iiint_U d(\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n})dS + \mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n}d^2S = \iiint_U d(\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n})dS \ $


Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Given a function $f:\R \to \R$, integrable on some open set $I$, we can recognize such a function a 0-form - that is, defined at a point and taking no vectors as inputs. Hence the exterior derivative is just the ordinary differential $f'(x)dx$. Since the ordinary differential is a 1-form, and we are integrating on a 1-manifold, we may use the general Stokes' theorem:

$\int_I f'(x)dx = \int_{\partial I} f(x)$

By Induced Orientations on Boundaries, $\partial I = \left\{{ x_0', x_1 }\right\}$ for some points $x_0, x_1$ where $y'$ indicates a point with "negative" orientation; we then have

$\int_{\partial I} f(x) = -f(x_0) + f(x_1) = f(x_1)-f(x_0)$

Cauchy's Residue Theorem

Let $z = x + iy$ and $f(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y)$ for two real functions $u,v$. Now, Let $D$ be a disk and $\partial D = C$ it's boundary a circle. Then by Stokes' Theorem

$\int_{C} f(z)dz = \int_{C} u(z)dx + v(z)dy = \int_{D} \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial v}{\partial x},$

Which is zero if $f$ satisfies the Cuachy Riemman Conditions.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
ProofWiki.org
ToDo
Toolbox
Google AdSense