Injection iff Inverse of Image Mapping
Contents |
Theorem
A mapping $f$ is an injection iff:
- $f^{-1}: \operatorname{Im} \left({f}\right) \to \operatorname{Dom} \left({f}\right)$
is a mapping.
Proof
Necessary Condition
Let $f: S \to T$ be an injection.
First we note that:
- $t \in \operatorname{Im} \left({f}\right) \implies \exists x \in \operatorname{Dom} \left({f}\right): f \left({x}\right) = t$
thus fulfilling the condition $\forall y \in T: \exists x \in S: f \left({x}\right)= y$.
Now let $t \in \operatorname{Im} \left({f}\right): \left({t, y}\right), \left({t, z}\right) \in f^{-1}$.
Thus:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \left({t, y}\right), \left({t, z}\right)\) | \(\in\) | \(\displaystyle f^{-1}\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \implies\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \left({y, t}\right), \left({z, t}\right)\) | \(\in\) | \(\displaystyle f\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Definition of Inverse | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \implies\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle f \left({y}\right) = t\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle f \left({z}\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Equality of Elements in Range of Mapping | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \implies\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle y\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle z\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | as $f$ is injective |
So by the definition of mapping, $f^{-1}$ is a mapping.
$\Box$
Sufficient Condition
Let $f^{-1}$ be a mapping.
We need to show that $\forall x, z \in \operatorname{Dom} \left({f}\right): f \left({x}\right) = f \left({z}\right) \implies x = z$.
So, pick any $x, z \in \operatorname{Dom} \left({f}\right)$ such that $ f \left({x}\right) = f \left({z}\right)$.
Then:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle f \left({x}\right)\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle f \left({z}\right)\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \implies\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \exists y \in \operatorname{Dom} \left({f}\right): \left({x, y}\right), \left({z, y}\right)\) | \(\in\) | \(\displaystyle f\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Definition of a Mapping | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \implies\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \left({y, x}\right), \left({y, z}\right)\) | \(\in\) | \(\displaystyle f^{-1}\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Definition of Inverse | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \implies\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle x\) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle z\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | as it is specified that $f^{-1}$ is a Definition of a Mapping |
Thus by the definition of an injection, $f$ is an injection.
$\blacksquare$
Comment
Some sources, for example W.E. Deskins: Abstract Algebra (1964), use this property as the definition of an injection.
Sources
- Nathan Jacobson: Lectures in Abstract Algebra: I. Basic Concepts (1951): Introduction $\S 2$ (passim)
- W.E. Deskins: Abstract Algebra (1964): $\S 1.3$: Definition $1.9 \ \text{(a)}$
- Seth Warner: Modern Algebra (1965)... (previous)... (next): $\S 5$: Theorem $5.2$
- W.A. Sutherland: Introduction to Metric and Topological Spaces (1975): Notation and Terminology