Material Equivalence
Contents |
Theorem
- $p \iff q \dashv \vdash \left({p \land q}\right) \lor \left({\neg p \land \neg q}\right)$
- $p \iff q \dashv \vdash \neg p \iff \neg q$
- $p \iff q \dashv \vdash \left({p \lor q}\right) \implies \left({p \land q}\right)$
Alternative rendition
These can alternatively be rendered as:
- $\vdash \left({p \iff q}\right) \iff \left({\left({p \land q}\right) \lor \left({\neg p \land \neg q}\right)}\right)$
- $\vdash \left({p \iff q}\right) \iff \left({\neg p \iff \neg q}\right)$
- $\vdash \left({p \iff q}\right) \iff \left({\left({p \lor q}\right) \implies \left({p \land q}\right)}\right)$
They can be seen to be logically equivalent to the forms above.
Proof
Proof by Natural Deduction
By the tableau method:
| Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | $p \iff q$ | P | (None) | |
| 2 | 1 | $\left ({p \implies q}\right) \land \left ({q \implies p}\right)$ | By definition | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | $p \implies q$ | $\land \mathcal{E}_1$ | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | $q \implies p$ | $\land \mathcal{E}_2$ | 2 | |
| 5 | $p \lor \neg p$ | LEM | (None) | ||
| 6 | 6 | $p$ | A | (None) | |
| 7 | 1, 6 | $q$ | $\implies \mathcal{E}$ | 3, 6 | |
| 8 | 1, 6 | $p \land q$ | $\land \mathcal{I}$ | 6, 7 | |
| 9 | 1, 6 | $\left({p \land q}\right) \lor \left({\neg p \land \neg q}\right)$ | $\lor \mathcal{I}_1$ | 8 | |
| 10 | 10 | $\neg p$ | A | (None) | |
| 11 | 1, 10 | $\neg q$ | MTT | 4, 10 | |
| 12 | 1, 10 | $\neg p \land \neg q$ | $\land \mathcal{I}$ | 10, 11 | |
| 13 | 1, 10 | $\left({p \land q}\right) \lor \left({\neg p \land \neg q}\right)$ | $\lor \mathcal{I}_2$ | 12 | |
| 14 | 1 | $\left({p \land q}\right) \lor \left({\neg p \land \neg q}\right)$ | $\lor \mathcal{E}$ | 1, 6-9, 10-13 |
| Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | $\left({p \land q}\right) \lor \left({\neg p \land \neg q}\right)$ | P | (None) | |
| 2 | 2 | $p \land q$ | A | (None) | |
| 3 | 3 | $p$ | A | (None) | |
| 4 | 2 | $q$ | $\land \mathcal{E}_2$ | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | $p \implies q$ | $\implies \mathcal{I}$ | 3, 4 | |
| 6 | 6 | $q$ | A | (None) | |
| 7 | 2 | $p$ | $\land \mathcal{E}_1$ | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | $q \implies p$ | $\implies \mathcal{I}$ | 6, 7 | |
| 9 | 2 | $\left ({p \implies q}\right) \land \left ({q \implies p}\right)$ | $\land \mathcal{I}$ | 5, 8 | |
| 10 | 10 | $\neg p \land \neg q$ | A | (None) | |
| 11 | 11 | $\neg p$ | A | (None) | |
| 12 | 10 | $\neg q$ | $\land \mathcal{E}_2$ | 10 | |
| 13 | 10 | $\neg p \implies \neg q$ | $\implies \mathcal{I}$ | 11, 12 | |
| 14 | 10 | $q \implies p$ | TP | 13 | |
| 15 | 15 | $\neg q$ | A | (None) | |
| 16 | 10 | $\neg p$ | $\land \mathcal{E}_1$ | 10 | |
| 17 | 10 | $\neg q \implies \neg p$ | $\implies \mathcal{I}$ | 15, 16 | |
| 18 | 10 | $p \implies q$ | TP | 17 | |
| 19 | 10 | $\left ({p \implies q}\right) \land \left ({q \implies p}\right)$ | $\land \mathcal{I}$ | 17, 13 | |
| 20 | 1 | $\left ({p \implies q}\right) \land \left ({q \implies p}\right)$ | $\lor \mathcal{E}$ | 1, 2-9, 10-20 | |
| 20 | 1 | $p \iff q$ | By definition | 19 |
$\blacksquare$
| Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | $p \iff q$ | P | (None) | |
| 2 | 1 | $\left ({p \implies q}\right) \land \left ({q \implies p}\right)$ | By definition | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | $\left ({\neg q \implies \neg p}\right) \land \left ({\neg p \implies \neg q}\right)$ | TP | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | $\left ({\neg p \implies \neg q}\right) \land \left ({\neg q \implies \neg p}\right)$ | Comm | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | $\neg p \iff \neg q$ | By definition | 4 |
The argument reverses:
| Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | $\neg p \iff \neg q$ | P | (None) | |
| 2 | 1 | $\left ({\neg p \implies \neg q}\right) \land \left ({\neg q \implies \neg p}\right)$ | By definition | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | $\left ({\neg \neg q \implies \neg \neg p}\right) \land \left ({\neg \neg p \implies \neg \neg q}\right)$ | TP | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | $\left ({q \implies p}\right) \land \left ({p \implies q}\right)$ | $\neg \neg \mathcal{E}$ | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | $\left ({p \implies q}\right) \land \left ({q \implies p}\right)$ | Comm | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | $p \iff q$ | By definition | 5 |
$\blacksquare$
| Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | $p \iff q$ | P | (None) | ||
| 2 | 1 | $\left({p \land q}\right) \lor \left({\neg p \land \neg q}\right)$ | SI | 1 | From above | |
| 3 | 1 | $\left({p \land q}\right) \lor \neg \left({p \lor q}\right)$ | DM | 2 | ||
| 4 | 1 | $\neg \left({p \lor q}\right) \lor \left({p \land q}\right)$ | Comm | 3 | ||
| 5 | 1 | $\left({p \lor q}\right) \implies \left({p \land q}\right)$ | Rule of Material Implication | 4 |
The argument reverses:
| Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | $\left({p \lor q}\right) \implies \left({p \land q}\right)$ | P | (None) | ||
| 2 | 1 | $\neg \left({p \lor q}\right) \lor \left({p \land q}\right)$ | Rule of Material Implication | 1 | ||
| 3 | 1 | $\left({p \land q}\right) \lor \neg \left({p \lor q}\right)$ | Comm | 2 | ||
| 4 | 1 | $\left({p \land q}\right) \lor \left({\neg p \land \neg q}\right)$ | DM | 3 | ||
| 5 | 1 | $\left ({p \implies q}\right) \land \left ({q \implies p}\right)$ | Comm | 4 | ||
| 6 | 1 | $p \iff q$ | SI | 5 | From above |
$\blacksquare$
Proof by Truth Table
We apply the Method of Truth Tables to the propositions in turn.
As can be seen by inspection, in all cases the truth values under the main connectives match for all models.
$\begin{array}{|ccc||ccccccccc|} \hline
p & \iff & q & (p & \land & q) & \lor & (\neg & p & \land & \neg & q) \\
\hline
F & T & F & F & F & F & T & T & F & T & T & F \\
F & F & T & F & F & T & F & T & F & F & F & T \\
T & F & F & T & F & F & F & F & T & F & T & F \\
T & T & T & T & T & T & T & F & T & F & F & T \\
\hline
\end{array}$
$\blacksquare$
$\begin{array}{|ccc||ccccc|} \hline
p & \iff & q & \neg & p & \iff & \neg & q \\
\hline
F & T & F & T & F & T & T & F \\
F & F & T & T & F & F & F & T \\
T & F & F & F & T & F & T & F \\
T & T & T & F & T & T & F & T \\
\hline
\end{array}$
$\blacksquare$
$\begin{array}{|ccc||ccccccc|} \hline
p & \iff & q & (p & \lor & q) & \implies & (p & \land & q) \\
\hline
F & T & F & F & F & F & T & F & F & F \\
F & F & T & F & T & T & F & F & F & T \\
T & F & F & T & T & F & F & T & F & F \\
T & T & T & T & T & T & T & T & T & T \\
\hline
\end{array}$
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- Donald Kalish and Richard Montague: Logic: Techniques of Formal Reasoning (1964): $\text{II}: \S 3$
- E.J. Lemmon: Beginning Logic (1965): $\S 1.4$: Exercises $1 \ \text{(c, d)}$
- D.J. O'Connor and Betty Powell: Elementary Logic (1980): $\S 1.13$: Exercise $\text{(A)} \ 12$