Order Isomorphism on Lattices
Theorem
Let $\left({S, \preccurlyeq_1}\right)$ and $\left({T, \preccurlyeq_2}\right)$ be posets.
Let $\phi: \left({S, \preccurlyeq_1}\right) \to \left({T, \preccurlyeq_2}\right)$ be an order isomorphism.
Then $\left({S, \preccurlyeq_1}\right)$ is a lattice iff $\left({T, \preccurlyeq_2}\right)$ is also a lattice.
Proof
Let $\left({S, \preccurlyeq_1}\right)$ be a lattice
Then by definition $\preccurlyeq_1$ is a lattice ordering.
We need to show that for all $x, y \in S$, the ordered set $\left({\left\{{\phi \left({x}\right), \phi \left({y}\right)}\right\}, \preccurlyeq_2}\right)$ admits both a supremum and an infimum.
Let $x, y \in S$.
Then $\left({\left\{{x, y}\right\}, \preccurlyeq_1}\right)$ admits both a supremum and an infimum.
Let $c = \sup \left({\left\{{x, y}\right\}, \preccurlyeq_1}\right)$.
Then by definition of supremum:
- $\forall s \in \left\{{x, y}\right\}: s \preccurlyeq_1 c$
- $\forall d \in S: c \preccurlyeq_1 d$
- where $d$ is an upper bound of $\left({\left\{{x, y}\right\}, \preccurlyeq_1}\right) \subseteq S$.
Now consider the image of $\left\{{x, y}\right\}$ under $\phi$.
By definition of order isomorphism:
- $\forall \phi \left({s}\right) \in \left\{{\phi \left({x}\right), \phi \left({y}\right)}\right\}: \phi \left({c}\right) \preccurlyeq_2 \phi \left({s}\right)$
- $\forall \phi \left({d}\right) \in S_2: \phi \left({d}\right) \succcurlyeq \phi \left({c}\right)$
- where $\phi \left({d}\right)$ is an upper bound of $\left({\left\{{\phi \left({x}\right), \phi \left({y}\right)}\right\}, \preccurlyeq_2}\right) \subseteq T$.
So by definition of supremum:
- $\phi \left({c}\right) = \sup \left({\left\{{\phi \left({x}\right), \phi \left({y}\right)}\right\}, \preccurlyeq_2}\right)$
That is, $\left({\left\{{\phi \left({x}\right), \phi \left({y}\right)}\right\}, \preccurlyeq_2}\right)$ admits a supremum.
Using a similar technique it can be shown that:
- If $c = \inf \left({\left\{{x, y}\right\}, \preccurlyeq}\right)$, then:
- $\phi \left({c}\right) = \inf \left({\left\{{\phi \left({x}\right), \phi \left({y}\right)}\right\}, \preccurlyeq_2}\right)$
Hence $\left({\left\{{\phi \left({x}\right), \phi \left({y}\right)}\right\}, \preccurlyeq_2}\right)$ admits both a supremum and an infimum.
That is, $\preccurlyeq_2$ is a lattice ordering and so $\left({T, \preccurlyeq_2}\right)$ is a lattice.
By Inverse of Order Isomorphism, if $\phi$ is an order isomorphism then so is $\phi^{-1}$.
So the same technique is used to show that if $\left({T, \preccurlyeq_2}\right)$ is a lattice then so is $\left({S, \preccurlyeq_1}\right)$.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- Seth Warner: Modern Algebra (1965)... (previous)... (next): $\S 14$: Theorem $14.4$