Ordering Equivalent to a Subset Relation
Theorem
Let $\left({S, \preceq}\right)$ be a poset.
Then there exists a set $\mathbb S$ of subsets of $S$ such that:
- $\left({S, \preceq}\right) \cong \left({\mathbb S, \subseteq}\right)$
where:
- $\left({\mathbb S, \subseteq}\right)$ is the relational structure consisting of $\mathbb S$ and the subset relation
- $\cong$ denotes order isomorphism.
Hence the subset relation is, up to order isomorphism, the only ordering there is on a given set of subsets.
Proof
From Subset Relation is Ordering, we have that $\left({\mathbb S, \subseteq}\right)$ is a poset.
For each $a \in S$, let $S_a$ be the weak initial segment of $a$. That is:
- $S_a := \left\{{b \in S: b \preceq a}\right\}$
Then let $T$ be defined as:
- $T := \left\{{S_a: a \in S}\right\}$
Let the mapping $\phi: S \to T$ be defined as:
- $\phi \left({a}\right) = S_a$
We are to show that $\phi$ is an order isomorphism.
$\phi$ is clearly surjective, as every $S_a$ is defined from some $a \in S$.
Now suppose $S_x, S_y \in T: S_x = S_y$.
Then:
- $\left({b \in S: b \preceq x}\right\} = \left({b \in S: b \preceq y}\right\}$
We have that $x \in S_x = S_y$ and $y \in S_y = S_x$ which means $x \preceq y$ and $y \preceq x$.
So as an ordering is antisymmetric, we have $x = y$ and so $\phi$ is injective.
Hence by definition, $\phi$ is a bijection.
Now let $a_1 \preceq a_2$. Then by definition, $a_1 \in S_{a_2}$.
Let $a_3 \in S_{a_1}$.
Then by definition, $a_3 \preceq a_1$.
As an ordering is transitive, it follows that $a_3 \preceq a_2$ and so $a_3 \in S_{a_2}$.
So by definition of a subset, $S_{a_1} \subseteq S_{a_2}$.
Thus it follows that $\phi$ is an order isomorphism between $\left({S, \preceq}\right)$ and $\left({\mathbb S, \subseteq}\right)$.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- Keith Devlin: The Joy of Sets: Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory (1993): $\S 1.5$: Theorem $1.5.2$