Oscillation Zero if and only if Continuous

From ProofWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Theorem

Let $f: D \to \R$ be a real function where $D \subseteq \R$.

Let $\omega_f\left({I}\right)$ be the oscillation of $f$ over the interval $I = \left({a \,.\,.\, b}\right)$, that is:

$\omega_f \left({I}\right) = \sup \left\{{\vert f \left({x}\right) - f \left({y}\right) \vert: x, y \in I}\right\}$
$\omega_f \left({x}\right) = \inf \left\{{\omega_f \left({I}\right): x \in I}\right\}$

Then $\omega_f \left({x}\right) = 0$ iff $f$ is continuous at $x$.


Proof

While it is not strictly necessary for the interval $I$ to be open, $x$ must be a member of the open region of any interval $I$ to prevent right-continuous or left-continuous points from having $\omega_f \left({x}\right) = 0$.

For simplicity, we can take $I$ to be an open interval without loss of generality.


Necessary Condition

Suppose $\omega_f \left({x}\right) = 0$.

Let $\epsilon > 0$.

Suppose that $\forall I: x \in I, \omega_f \left({I} \right) \ge \epsilon$.

Then by definition, $\omega_f \left({x}\right) = \epsilon$.

From this contradiction we deduce that:

$\exists I: x \in I, \omega_f \left({I}\right) < \epsilon$.

For this particular $I = (a,b)$, let $\delta \in \R$ such that:

$\delta = \min\left\{x-a, b-x\right\}$

$\delta > 0$ because $a < x < b$ by the openness of $I$.

So for our specific $x$, if:

$\left \vert {x - y} \right \vert < \delta \implies x, y \in I$

then:

$\left \vert {f \left({x}\right) - f \left({y}\right)} \right \vert \leq \omega_f\left( I \right) < \epsilon$

This construction is valid for all $\epsilon$, so from the definition of continuity, we have that $f$ is continuous at $x$.


Sufficient Condition

Suppose $f$ is continuous at $x$.

Then $\forall \epsilon > 0: \exists \delta \in \R$ such that:

$\left \vert x-y \right \vert < \delta \implies \left \vert f \left({x}\right)-f \left({y}\right) \right \vert < \epsilon$

Let the interval $I_\delta$ be defined as:

$I_\delta := \left({x - \delta \,.\,.\, x + \delta}\right)$

Then:

\(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \omega_f \left({I_\delta}\right)\) \(=\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \sup \left\{ {\left \vert f \left({x}\right) - f \left({y}\right) \right \vert : x, y \in I_\delta}\right\}\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \)                    
\(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(<\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \epsilon\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \)                    
\(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \implies\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \inf \left\{ {\omega_f \left({I}\right): x \in I}\right\}\) \(=\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \omega_f \left({x}\right)\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \)                    
\(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(<\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \omega_f \left({I_{\delta} }\right)\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \)                    
\(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(<\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \epsilon\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \)                    


This holds true for any value of $\epsilon$.

Thus $\omega_f \left({x}\right)$ must be $0$.

Hence the result.

$\blacksquare$