Prime Group has No Proper Subgroups
Theorem
A nontrivial group $G$ has no proper subgroups except the trivial one iff $G$ is finite and its order is prime.
Proof
- Suppose $G$ is finite and of prime order $p$.
Then from Lagrange's Theorem the order of any subgroup of $G$ must divide the order $p$ of $G$.
From the definition of prime, any subgroups of $p$ can therefore only have order $1$ or $p$.
Hence $G$ can have only itself and the Trivial Group as subgroups.
- Now suppose $G$ is not finite and prime.
Take any element $h \in G, h \ne e$. Then $H = \left \langle {h} \right \rangle$ is a cyclic subgroup of $G$.
If $H \ne G$ then $H$ is a non-trivial proper subgroup of $G$, and the proof is done.
Otherwise, $H = G$ is a cyclic group and there are two possibilities:
- $(1): \quad G$ is infinite
- $(2): \quad G$ is finite (and of non-prime order).
First, suppose $G$ is infinite.
Then $G$ is isomorphic to $\left({\Z, +}\right)$ from Cyclic Groups Same Order Isomorphic.
Now, from Additive Group of Integer Multiples, $\left({\Z, +}\right)$ has proper subgroups, for example $\left \langle {2} \right \rangle$.
Because $G \cong \left({\Z, +}\right)$, then so does $G$ have proper subgroups, and the proof is complete.
Now suppose $G$ is finite, and of an order $n$ where $n$ is not prime.
Then $\exists d \in \N: d \backslash n, 1 < d < n$.
From Subgroup of Cyclic Group whose Order Divisor, $G$ has a proper subgroup of order $d$ and again, the proof is complete.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- Seth Warner: Modern Algebra (1965): $\S 25$: Exercise $25.7 \ \text{(a)}$
- Allan Clark: Elements of Abstract Algebra (1971)... (previous)... (next): $\S 38 \gamma$
- Thomas A. Whitelaw: An Introduction to Abstract Algebra (1978)... (previous)... (next): Exercise $6.20$