Reflexive contains Diagonal Relation
From ProofWiki
Contents |
Theorem
A relation $\mathcal R \subseteq S \times S$ is reflexive iff it contains the diagonal relation: $\Delta_S \subseteq \mathcal R$.
Proof
- Suppose $\Delta_S \not \subseteq \mathcal R$.
Then $\exists \left({x, x}\right): \left({x, x}\right) \notin \mathcal R$.
Thus $\exists x \in S: \left({x, x}\right) \notin \mathcal R$
and so $\mathcal R$ is not reflexive.
- Now suppose $\Delta_S \subseteq \mathcal R$.
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \forall x \in S: \left({x, x}\right)\) | \(\in\) | \(\displaystyle \Delta_S\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Diagonal Relation | ||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \implies\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \forall x \in S: \left({x, x}\right)\) | \(\in\) | \(\displaystyle \mathcal R\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | Definition of Subset |
Thus $\mathcal R$ is reflexive.
$\blacksquare$
Comment
Some sources use this as the definition of a reflexive relation.
Sources
- Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory (1960)... (previous)... (next): $\S 10$: Inverses and Composites
- Steven A. Gaal: Point Set Topology (1964)... (previous)... (next): Introduction to Set Theory: $1$. Elementary Operations on Sets
- Seth Warner: Modern Algebra (1965)... (previous)... (next): Exercise $10.6 \ \text{(a)}$
- George McCarty: Topology: An Introduction with Application to Topological Groups (1967): Chapter $\text{I}$