Talk:Dirac's Theorem
From ProofWiki
I've looked at the body of the theorem as given, and it's the same as the proof of Ore's Theorem, from which this theorem follows as a direct corollary.
Would it be appropriate to remove the main proof and just replace it with the "alternative proof" as given? --Matt Westwood 07:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Sounds ok to me. The only times when I'm against just citing a previous result are for really important/historic/proof-is-given-in-every-textbook theorems (Fundamental Theorems, Squareroot of 2 is irrational, etc.) --Cynic (talk) 08:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Okay then, that's done. I've left it commented out in case someone decides they must reinstate it. --Matt Westwood 21:22, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
