User:Prime.mover/Proof Structures

From ProofWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Ordinary proofs

\(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(=\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \)                    
\(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \implies\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(=\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \)                    

...etc.

Iff Proofs

Necessary Condition

Sufficient Condition

Equivalence Proofs

Checking in turn each of the criteria for equivalence:


Reflexivity

So ... has been shown to be reflexive.

$\Box$


Symmetry

So ... has been shown to be symmetric.


$\Box$


Transitivity

So ... has been shown to be transitive.


$\Box$


... has been shown to be reflexive, symmetric and transitive.

Hence by definition it is an equivalence relation.

$\blacksquare$


Ordering Proofs

Checking in turn each of the criteria for an ordering:

Reflexivity

So ... has been shown to be reflexive.

$\Box$


Transitivity

So ... has been shown to be transitive.

$\Box$


Antisymmetry

So ... has been shown to be antisymmetric.

$\Box$


... has been shown to be reflexive, transitive and antisymmetric.

Hence by definition it is an ordering.

$\blacksquare$

Strict Ordering Proofs

Checking in turn each of the criteria for a strict ordering:

Antireflexivity

So ... has been shown to be antireflexive.

$\Box$


Transitivity

So ... has been shown to be transitive.

$\Box$


Asymmetry

So ... has been shown to be asymmetric.

$\Box$


... has been shown to be antireflexive, transitive and asymmetric.

Hence by definition it is a strict ordering.

$\blacksquare$

Group Proofs

Taking the group axioms in turn:

G0: Closure

Thus ... and so ... is closed.

$\Box$


G1: Associativity

Thus ... is associative.

$\Box$


G2: Identity

Thus ... has an identity element.

$\Box$


G3: Inverses

Thus every element of ... has an inverse.

$\Box$


All the group axioms are thus seen to be fulfilled, and so ... is a group.

$\blacksquare$

Ring Proofs

Taking the ring axioms in turn:

A: Addition forms a Group

M0: Closure of Ring Product

M1: Associativity of Ring Product

D: Distributivity of Ring Product over Addition

Proof by Mathematical Induction

Proof by induction:

For all $n \in \N^*$, let $P \left({n}\right)$ be the proposition:

$proposition_n$


$P \left({1}\right)$ is true, as this just says $proposition_1$.


Basis for the Induction

$P \left({2}\right)$ is the case:

$proposition_2$

which has been proved above.

This is our basis for the induction.


Induction Hypothesis

Now we need to show that, if $P \left({k}\right)$ is true, where $k \ge 2$, then it logically follows that $P \left({k+1}\right)$ is true.


So this is our induction hypothesis:

$proposition_k$


Then we need to show:

$proposition_{k+1}$


Induction Step

This is our induction step:


\(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(=\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \)                    
\(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \implies\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(=\) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \) \(\displaystyle \)                    

So $P \left({k}\right) \implies P \left({k+1}\right)$ and the result follows by the Principle of Mathematical Induction.


Therefore:

$proposition_n$

Tableau proofs

Line Pool Formula Rule Depends upon Notes
<line number> <line numbers> $\ldots{}$ link to ProofWiki entry <line numbers>
<line number> <line numbers> $\ldots{}$ link to ProofWiki entry <line numbers>

...etc.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
ProofWiki.org
ToDo
Toolbox
Google AdSense