User:Prime.mover/Proof Structures
Contents |
Ordinary proofs
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \implies\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) |
...etc.
Iff Proofs
Necessary Condition
Sufficient Condition
Equivalence Proofs
Checking in turn each of the criteria for equivalence:
Reflexivity
So ... has been shown to be reflexive.
$\Box$
Symmetry
So ... has been shown to be symmetric.
$\Box$
Transitivity
So ... has been shown to be transitive.
$\Box$
... has been shown to be reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
Hence by definition it is an equivalence relation.
$\blacksquare$
Ordering Proofs
Checking in turn each of the criteria for an ordering:
Reflexivity
So ... has been shown to be reflexive.
$\Box$
Transitivity
So ... has been shown to be transitive.
$\Box$
Antisymmetry
So ... has been shown to be antisymmetric.
$\Box$
... has been shown to be reflexive, transitive and antisymmetric.
Hence by definition it is an ordering.
$\blacksquare$
Strict Ordering Proofs
Checking in turn each of the criteria for a strict ordering:
Antireflexivity
So ... has been shown to be antireflexive.
$\Box$
Transitivity
So ... has been shown to be transitive.
$\Box$
Asymmetry
So ... has been shown to be asymmetric.
$\Box$
... has been shown to be antireflexive, transitive and asymmetric.
Hence by definition it is a strict ordering.
$\blacksquare$
Group Proofs
Taking the group axioms in turn:
G0: Closure
Thus ... and so ... is closed.
$\Box$
G1: Associativity
Thus ... is associative.
$\Box$
G2: Identity
Thus ... has an identity element.
$\Box$
G3: Inverses
Thus every element of ... has an inverse.
$\Box$
All the group axioms are thus seen to be fulfilled, and so ... is a group.
$\blacksquare$
Ring Proofs
Taking the ring axioms in turn:
A: Addition forms a Group
M0: Closure of Ring Product
M1: Associativity of Ring Product
D: Distributivity of Ring Product over Addition
Proof by Mathematical Induction
Proof by induction:
For all $n \in \N^*$, let $P \left({n}\right)$ be the proposition:
- $proposition_n$
$P \left({1}\right)$ is true, as this just says $proposition_1$.
Basis for the Induction
$P \left({2}\right)$ is the case:
- $proposition_2$
which has been proved above.
This is our basis for the induction.
Induction Hypothesis
Now we need to show that, if $P \left({k}\right)$ is true, where $k \ge 2$, then it logically follows that $P \left({k+1}\right)$ is true.
So this is our induction hypothesis:
- $proposition_k$
Then we need to show:
- $proposition_{k+1}$
Induction Step
This is our induction step:
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | |||
| \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \implies\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(=\) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) | \(\displaystyle \) |
So $P \left({k}\right) \implies P \left({k+1}\right)$ and the result follows by the Principle of Mathematical Induction.
Therefore:
- $proposition_n$
Tableau proofs
| Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <line number> | <line numbers> | $\ldots{}$ | link to ProofWiki entry | <line numbers> | ||
| <line number> | <line numbers> | $\ldots{}$ | link to ProofWiki entry | <line numbers> |
...etc.