Well-Ordering Principle
Contents |
Theorem
Every non-empty subset of $\N$ has a minimal (or smallest, or first) element.
This is called the well-ordering property of $\N$, or the well-ordering principle.
Some sources give this as the least-integer principle.
The well-ordering principle also holds for $\N_{\ne 0}$.
Proof
- The set of natural numbers is defined as the archetype of the naturally ordered semigroup.
From the definition of the naturally ordered semigroup, $\left({S, \circ, \preceq}\right)$ is well-ordered by $\preceq$.
So as $\left({\N, +, \le}\right) \cong \left({S, \circ, \preceq}\right)$ the result follows.
- As $\N_{\ne 0} = \N \setminus \left\{{0}\right\}$, by Set Difference Subset $\N_{\ne 0} \subseteq \N$.
As $\N$ is well-ordered, by definition, every subset of $\N$ has a minimal element.
$\blacksquare$
Notes
- This theorem is equivalent to the Principle of Mathematical Induction and the Principle of Complete Induction.
Also see
Some authors extend the scope of this theorem to include:
This theorem should not be confused with the Well-Ordering Theorem, which states that any set can have an ordering under which that set is a well-ordered set.
Sources
- Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory (1960)... (previous)... (next): $\S 13$: Arithmetic
- W.E. Deskins: Abstract Algebra (1964): $\S 2.3$: Theorem $2.16$
- Donald E. Knuth: The Art of Computer Programming: Volume 1: Fundamental Algorithms (1968): $\S 1.2.1$: Exercise $15$
- George E. Andrews: Number Theory (1971): $\S 2.1$: Exercise $3$
- Allan Clark: Elements of Abstract Algebra (1971)... (previous)... (next): $\S 20$
- K.G. Binmore: Mathematical Analysis: A Straightforward Approach (1977)... (previous)... (next): $\S 3.5$
- Gary Chartrand: Introductory Graph Theory (1977): Appendix $\text{A}.6$