Arithmetic iff Compact Subset form Lattice in Algebraic Lattice
Theorem
Let $L = \struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a bounded below algebraic lattice.
Then:
- $L$ is arithmetic
- $\struct {\map K L, \precsim}$ is a lattice
where $\map K L$ denotes the compact subset of $L$:
- $\mathord \precsim = \mathord \preceq \cap \paren {\map K L \times \map K L}$
Proof
Sufficient Condition
Define $K = \struct {\map K L, \precsim}$.
Let $x, y \in \map K L$.
By Compact Subset is Join Subsemilattice:
- $x \vee_L y \in \map K L$
We will prove that
- $x \vee_L y$ is upper bound for $\set {x, y}$ in $K$
Let $z \in \set {x, y}$.
- $z \preceq x \vee_L y$
By definition of $\precsim$:
- $z \precsim v \vee_L y$
$\Box$
We will prove that
- $\forall z \in \map K L: z$ is upper bound for $\set {x, y}$ in $K \implies x \vee_L y \precsim z$
Let $z \in \map K L$ such that
- $z$ is upper bound for $\set {x, y}$ in $K$.
Then by definition of $\precsim$:
- $z$ is upper bound for $\set {x, y}$ in $L$.
By definition of supremum:
- $x \vee_L y \preceq z$
By definition of $\precsim$:
- $x \vee_L y \precsim z$
$\Box$
Thus by definition of supremum:
- $\set {x, y}$ admits a supremum in $K$.
Thus analogically:
- $\set {x, y}$ admits an infimum in $K$.
Hence $K$ is lattice.
$\Box$
Necessary Condition
Let $K$ be a lattice.
Thus $L$ is algebraic.
It remains to prove that
- $\map K L$ is meet closed.
Let $x, y \in \map K L$.
Define $X := {\inf_L \set {x, y} }^{\mathrm{compact} }$
By definition of algebraic:
- $L$ satisfies the axiom of $K$-approximation.
By the axiom of $K$-approximation:
- $\inf_L \set {x, y} = \sup_L X$
By definition of algebraic:
- $X$ is directed and $L$ is up-complete.
By definition of up-complete:
- $X$ admits a supremum in $L$.
By definition of lattice:
- $\set {x, y}$ admits an infimum in $K$.
By definition of infimum:
- $\inf_K \set {x, y}$ is lower bound for $\set {x, y}$ in $K$.
We will prove that
- $X \subseteq x^{\mathrm{compact} } \cap y^{\mathrm{compact} }$
Let $z \in X$.
By definition of compact closure:
- $z \preceq \inf_L \set {x, y}$ and $z$ is compact.
By definition of infimum:
- $\inf_L \set {x, y}$ is lower bound for $\set {x, y}$
By definition of lower bound:
- $\inf_L \set {x, y} \preceq x$ and $\inf_L \set {x, y} \preceq y$
By definition of transitivity:
- $z \preceq x$ and $z \preceq y$
By definition of compact closure:
- $z \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ and $z \in y^{\mathrm{compact} }$
Thus by definition of intersection:
- $z \in x^{\mathrm{compact} } \cap y^{\mathrm{compact} }$
$\Box$
By Compact Closure is Intersection of Lower Closure and Compact Subset:
- $X = \paren {\inf_L \set {x, y} }^\preceq \cap \map K L$
- $X \subseteq \map K L$
We will prove that:
- $\inf_K \set {x, y}$ is upper bound for $X$ in $K$.
Let $z \in X$.
By definition of intersection:
- $z \in x^{\mathrm{compact} }$ and $z \in y^{\mathrm{compact} }$
By definition of compact closure:
- $z \preceq x$ and $z \preceq y$
By definition of $\precsim$:
- $z \precsim x$ and $z \precsim y$
Thus by definition of infimum:
- $z \precsim \inf_K \set {x, y}$
$\Box$
By definition of $\precsim$:
- $\inf_K \set {x, y}$ is upper bound for $X$ in $L$.
By definition of supremum:
- $\sup_L \set {x, y} \preceq \inf_K \set {x, y}$
By definition of supremum:
- $\sup_K \set {x, y}$ is upper bound for $\set {x, y}$ in $K$.
By definition of upper bound:
- $x \precsim \sup_K \set {x, y}$ and $y \precsim \sup_K \set {x, y}$
By definition of $\precsim$:
- $x \preceq \sup_K \set {x, y}$ and $y \preceq \sup_K \set {x, y}$
By definition of infimum:
- $\sup_K \set {x, y} \preceq \sup_L \set {x, y}$
By definition of antisymmetry:
- $\sup_K \set {x, y} = \sup_L \set {x, y}$
Thus by definition of meet:
- $x \wedge_L y \in \map K L$
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1980: G. Gierz, K.H. Hofmann, K. Keimel, J.D. Lawson, M.W. Mislove and D.S. Scott: A Compendium of Continuous Lattices
- Mizar article WAYBEL_8:19