Axiom:Axiom of Extension/Set Theory
Axiom
Let $A$ and $B$ be sets.
The Axiom of Extension states that:
- $A$ and $B$ are equal
- they contain the same elements.
That is, if and only if:
and:
This can be formulated as follows:
Formulation 1
- $\forall x: \paren {x \in A \iff x \in B} \iff A = B$
Formulation 2
In set theories that define $=$ instead of admitting it as a primitive, the axiom of extension can be formulated as:
- $\forall x: \paren {\paren {A = B \land A \in x} \implies B \in x}$
The order of the elements in the sets is immaterial.
Hence a set is completely and uniquely determined by its elements.
Also known as
The Axiom of Extension is also known as:
- the Axiom of Extensionality
- the Axiom of Extent.
Also see
Linguistic Note
The nature of the Axiom of Extension, or Axiom of Extensionality as it is frequently called, suggests that the Axiom of Extent, ought in fact to be the preferred name, as it gives a precise definition of the extent of a collection.
However, the word extensionality is a term in logic which determines equality of objects by its external features, as opposed to intensionality, which is more concerned with internal structure.
Sources
- 1960: Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$: The Axiom of Extension
- 1964: W.E. Deskins: Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: A Common Language: $\S 1.1$ Sets
- 1966: Richard A. Dean: Elements of Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 0.2$. Sets
- 1982: Alan G. Hamilton: Numbers, Sets and Axioms ... (next): $\S 4$: Set Theory: $4.2$ The Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms: $\text {ZF1}$
- 1993: Keith Devlin: The Joy of Sets: Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$: Naive Set Theory: $\S 1.1$: What is a Set?
- 1996: Winfried Just and Martin Weese: Discovering Modern Set Theory. I: The Basics ... (previous) ... (next): Part $1$: Not Entirely Naive Set Theory: Chapter $1$: Pairs, Relations, and Functions