Borel-Cantelli Lemma
Theorem
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a measure space.
Let $\sequence {E_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a sequence of $\Sigma$-measurable sets.
If:
- $\ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \map \mu {E_n} < \infty$
then:
- $\ds \map \mu {\limsup_{n \mathop \to \infty} E_n} = 0$
where $\limsup$ denotes limit superior of sets.
Proof
By definition of limit superior:
- $\ds \limsup_{n \mathop \to \infty} E_n = \bigcap_{i \mathop = 1}^\infty \bigcup_{j \mathop = i}^\infty E_j$
Thus, by Measure is Monotone and Intersection is Subset:
- $(1): \quad \ds \map \mu {\limsup_{n \mathop \to \infty} E_n} = \map \mu {\bigcap_{i \mathop = 1}^\infty \bigcup_{j \mathop = i}^\infty E_j} \le \map \mu {\bigcup_{j \mathop = i}^\infty E_j}$
for all $i \in \N$.
- $\ds \map \mu {\bigcup_{j \mathop = i}^\infty E_j} \le \sum_{j \mathop = i}^\infty \map \mu {E_j}$
However, by assumption $\ds \sum_{n \mathop = 1}^\infty \map \mu {E_n}$ converges.
By Tail of Convergent Series tends to Zero this implies:
- $\ds \lim_{i \mathop \to \infty} \sum_{n \mathop = i}^\infty \map \mu {E_n} = 0$
Now $(1)$ implies, together with Lower and Upper Bounds for Sequences, that:
- $\ds \map \mu {\limsup_{n \mathop \to \infty} E_n} \le 0$
But as $\mu$ is a measure, the converse inequality also holds.
Hence:
- $\ds \map \mu {\limsup_{n \mathop \to \infty} E_n} = 0$
$\blacksquare$
Borel-Cantelli Lemma in Probability
![]() | This page or section has statements made on it that ought to be extracted and proved in a Theorem page. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by creating any appropriate Theorem pages that may be needed. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. |
As each probability space $\struct {X, \Sigma, \Pr}$ is a measure space, the result carries over to probability theory.
Hence, given any countable sequence of events $E_n$, the sum of whose probabilities is finite, the probability that infinitely many of the events occur is zero.
Also see
Source of Name
This entry was named for Émile Borel and Francesco Paolo Cantelli.
Sources
- 1989: Ephraim J. Borowski and Jonathan M. Borwein: Dictionary of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): Borel-Cantelli lemma
- 2005: René L. Schilling: Measures, Integrals and Martingales ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 6$: Problem $9$
- 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Borel-Cantelli Lemma