Composition of Mappings is not Commutative
Theorem
The composition of mappings is not in general a commutative binary operation:
- $f_2 \circ f_1 \ne f_1 \circ f_2$
Proof
Let $f_1: S_1 \to S_2$ and $f_2: S_2 \to S_3$ be mappings.
First note that unless $S_1 = S_3$ then $f_2 \circ f_1$ is not even defined.
So in that case $f_2 \circ f_1$ is definitely not the same thing as $f_1 \circ f_2$.
So, let us suppose $S_1 = S_3$ and so we define $f_1: S_1 \to S_2$ and $f_2: S_2 \to S_1$.
If $S_1 \ne S_2$ then:
- $f_2 \circ f_1: S_1 \to S_1$
- $f_1 \circ f_2: S_2 \to S_2$
and so by Equality of Mappings they are unequal because their domains and codomains are different.
Finally, suppose $S_1 = S_2$, and consider the following.
- $S_1 = S_2 = \set {a, b}$
- $f_1 = \set {\tuple {a, a}, \tuple {b, a} }$
- $f_2 = \set {\tuple {a, b}, \tuple {b, b} }$
It is straightforward to check that $f_1$ and $f_2$ are mappings, and that:
- $f_1 \circ f_2 = \set {\tuple {a, b}, \tuple {b, b} }$
- $f_2 \circ f_1 = \set {\tuple {a, a}, \tuple {b, a} }$
Thus, even in this limitingly simple case, we see that:
- $f_2 \circ f_1 \ne f_1 \circ f_2$
$\blacksquare$
Examples
Sum of Squares not Square of Sum
Let $f: \R \times \R \to \R$ be the real-valued function defined as:
- $\forall \tuple {x, y} \in \R \times \R: \map f {x, y} = x^2 + y^2$
Let $g: \R \times \R \to \R$ be the real-valued function defined as:
- $\forall \tuple {x, y} \in \R \times \R: \map g {x, y} = x + y$
Let $h: \R \to \R$ be the real function defined as:
- $\forall x \in \R: \map g x = x^2$
Then we have that:
- $\map h {\map g {x, y} } = \paren {x + y}^2$
while:
- $\map g {\map h x, \map h y} = x^2 + y^2 = \map f {x, y}$
Hence the diagram:
- $\begin{xy} \[email protected]+2mu@+1em{ \R \times \R \ar[r]^*{g} \ar@{-->}[rd]_*{f} & \R \ar[d]^*{h} \\ & \R }\end{xy}$
is not a commutative diagram.
Sources
- 1960: Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 10$: Inverses and Composites
- 1965: J.A. Green: Sets and Groups ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 3.4$. Product of mappings: Example $50$
- 1975: T.S. Blyth: Set Theory and Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 5$. Induced mappings; composition; injections; surjections; bijections: Remark $3$
- 1977: K.G. Binmore: Mathematical Analysis: A Straightforward Approach ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 7.16 \ (3)$
- 1978: Thomas A. Whitelaw: An Introduction to Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 24$: Composition of Mappings
- 1982: P.M. Cohn: Algebra Volume 1 (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Sets and mappings: $\S 1.3$: Mappings