Condition for Semigroup to be Internal Direct Product of Subgroup and Subsemigroup with Right Operation
Theorem
Let $\struct {S, \odot}$ be a semigroup.
Then:
- $\struct {S, \odot}$ is the internal direct product of a subgroup $\struct {G, \odot_G}$ and subsemigroup $\struct {H, \odot_H}$ such that $\odot_H$ is the right operation
- for all $x \in S$ there exists a left identity $a$ such that $x \odot a = x$, and element $y$ such that $y \odot x = a$.
Proof
Sufficient Condition
Let $\struct {S, \odot}$ be the internal direct product of a subgroup $\struct {G, \odot_G}$ and subsemigroup $\struct {H, \odot_H}$ such that $\odot_H$ is the right operation.
Hence, by definition, the mapping $\phi: G \times H \to S$ defined as:
- $\forall g \in H, h \in H: \map \phi {g, h} = g \odot h$
is an isomorphism from the (external) direct product $\struct {G, \odot_G} \times \struct {H, \odot_H}$ onto $\struct {S, \odot}$.
Thus a fortiori $\phi$ is a bijection.
From Condition for Mapping between Structure and Cartesian Product of Substructures to be Bijection:
- for all $s \in S$: there exists a unique $\tuple {x, y} \in A \times B$ such that $x \odot y = s$.
So, let $e \in G$ be the identity element of $G$.
As $e \in G \implies e \in S$, the above condition therefore applies to $e$.
We have that:
- $\forall g \in G: g \odot e = g = e \odot g$
This also applies to $e$:
- $e \odot e = e$
But we have:
- $\forall z \in G: e = z \odot z^{-1}$
where $z^{-1} \in G$.
So, as $e$ can be represented uniquely in the form $e = x \odot y$, it follows that that unique representation is:
- $e = e \odot e$
where $e \in G \cap H$.
We have that:
- $\forall g \in G: g \odot e = g$
is the unique representation of $g$ such that $\tuple {g, e} \in G \odot H$.
Then we have by definition of right operation:
- $\forall h \in H: e \odot h = h$
which is the unique representation of $h$ such that $\tuple {e, h} \in G \odot H$.
We have by definition of the identity element of $G$ that:
- $\forall g \in G: e \odot g = g$
Now let $z \in G \odot H$ such that $z \notin G$ and $z \notin H$.
Then we have that:
- $z = g \odot h$
where $g \in G$ and $h \in H$ uniquely.
Thus:
\(\ds e \odot z\) | \(=\) | \(\ds e \odot \paren {g \odot h}\) | Definition of $z$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {e \odot g} \odot h\) | Semigroup Axiom $\text S 1$: Associativity | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds g \odot h\) | as $e$ is the identity element of $G$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds z\) | Definition of $z$ |
So we have shown that:
- $\forall s \in S: e \odot s = s$
Hence, by definition, $e$ is a left identity in $S$.
Hence there exists at least one left identity in $S$.
$\Box$
Let $x \in S$ be arbitrary.
It is to be shown that:
- there exists a left identity $a$ in $S$ such that $x \odot a = x$
- $\exists y \in S: y \odot x = a$
By Group Axiom $\text G 2$: Existence of Identity Element, for all $g \in G$:
- $\exists e \in G: g \odot e = g$
By Group Axiom $\text G 3$: Existence of Inverse Element, for all $g \in G$:
- $\exists g^{-1} \in G: g^{-1} \odot g = e$
and so for elements $g$ of $G$:
- $e$ fulfils the condition of $a$
- $g^{-1}$ fulfils the condition of $y$.
This theorem requires a proof. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by crafting such a proof. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{ProofWanted}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |
Necessary Condition
Let $\struct {S, \odot}$ be a semigroup such that for all $x \in S$:
- there exists a left identity $a$ such that $x \odot a = x$
- there exists an element $y$ such that $y \odot x = a$.
Then $\struct {S, \odot}$ is not empty, by definition.
Let $H \subseteq S$ be the set of all left identities of $S$.
Let $e \in H$ be arbitrary.
Let $G = S \odot \set e$ be the subset product of $S$ with $\set e$.
This theorem requires a proof. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by crafting such a proof. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{ProofWanted}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |
Sources
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {II}$: New Structures from Old: $\S 13$: Compositions Induced on Cartesian Products and Function Spaces: Exercise $13.16$