Conjunction of Disjunctions Consequence
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
- $\paren {p \lor q} \land \paren {r \lor s} \vdash p \lor r \lor \paren {q \land s}$
Proof
By the tableau method of natural deduction:
Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | $\paren {p \lor q} \land \paren {r \lor s}$ | Premise | (None) | ||
2 | 1 | $\paren {p \land \paren {r \lor s} } \lor \paren {q \land \paren {r \lor s} }$ | Sequent Introduction | 1 | Conjunction Distributes over Disjunction | |
3 | $p \land \paren {r \lor s} \implies p$ | Theorem Introduction | (None) | Simplification | ||
4 | $q \land \paren {r \lor s} \implies \paren {q \land r} \lor \paren {q \land s}$ | Theorem Introduction | (None) | Conjunction Distributes over Disjunction | ||
5 | $q \land r \implies r$ | Theorem Introduction | (None) | Simplification | ||
6 | $q \land s \implies q \land s$ | Theorem Introduction | (None) | Law of Identity/Formulation 2 | ||
7 | $\paren {q \land r} \lor \paren {q \land s} \implies r \lor \paren {q \land s}$ | Sequent Introduction | 5,6 | Constructive Dilemma | ||
8 | $q \land \paren {r \lor s} \implies r \lor \paren {q \land s}$ | Sequent Introduction | 4,7 | Hypothetical Syllogism | ||
9 | $\paren {p \lor q} \land \paren {r \lor s} \implies p \lor \paren {r \lor \paren {q \land s} }$ | Sequent Introduction | 3,8 | Constructive Dilemma | ||
10 | 1 | $p \lor \paren {r \lor \paren {q \land s} }$ | Modus Ponendo Ponens: $\implies \mathcal E$ | 9, 1 | ||
11 | 1 | $\paren {p \lor r} \lor \paren {q \land s}$ | Sequent Introduction | 10 | Rule of Association |
$\blacksquare$