Definition:Measurable Set
Definition
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma}$ be a measurable space.
A subset $S \subseteq X$ is said to be ($\Sigma$-)measurable if and only if $S \in \Sigma$.
Measurable Set of an Arbitrary Outer Measure
Let $\mu^*$ be an outer measure on $X$.
A subset $S \subseteq X$ is called $\mu^*$-measurable if and only if it satisfies the Carathéodory condition:
- $\map {\mu^*} A = \map {\mu^*} {A \cap S} + \map {\mu^*} {A \setminus S}$
for every $A \subseteq X$.
By Set Difference as Intersection with Complement, this is equivalent to:
- $\map {\mu^*} A = \map {\mu^*} {A \cap S} + \map {\mu^*} {A \cap \map \complement S}$
where $\map \complement S$ denotes the relative complement of $S$ in $X$.
The collection of $\mu^*$-measurable sets is denoted $\map {\mathfrak M} {\mu^*}$ and is a $\sigma$-algebra over $X$.
Measurable Subset of the Reals
A subset $S$ of the real numbers $\R$ is said to be Lebesgue measurable, or frequently just measurable, if and only if for every set $A \in \R$:
- $\map {\lambda^*} A = \map {\lambda^*} {A \cap S} + \map {\lambda^*} {A \setminus S}$
where $\lambda^*$ is the Lebesgue outer measure.
The set of all measurable sets of $\R$ is frequently denoted $\mathfrak M_\R$ or just $\mathfrak M$.
Measurable Subset of $\R^n$
A subset $S$ of $\R^n$ is said to be Lebesgue measurable, frequently just measurable, if and only if for every set $A \in \R^n$:
- $m^* A = \map {m^*} {A \cap S} + \map {m^*} {A \cap \map \complement S}$
where:
- $\map \complement S$ is the complement of $S$ in $\R^n$
- $m^*$ is defined as:
- $\ds \map {m^*} S = \inf_{\set {I_k}: S \mathop \subseteq \cup I_k} \sum \map v {I_k}$
where:
- $\set {I_k}$ are a sequence of sets satisfying:
- $I_k = \closedint {a_1} {b_1} \times \dots \times \closedint {a_k} {b_k}$
- $\map v {I_n}$ is the volume $\ds \prod_{i \mathop = 1}^n \size {b_i - a_i}$
The set of all measurable sets of $\R^n$ is frequently denoted $\mathfrak M_{\R^n}$.
Also see
- Existence of Non-Measurable Subset of Real Numbers: from the axiom of choice, it is demonstrated that there exist non-measurable subsets of $\R$.
Sources
![]() | This page may be the result of a refactoring operation. As such, the following source works, along with any process flow, will need to be reviewed. When this has been completed, the citation of that source work (if it is appropriate that it stay on this page) is to be placed above this message, into the usual chronological ordering. In particular: Refactored page now has 3 subpages If you have access to any of these works, then you are invited to review this list, and make any necessary corrections. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{SourceReview}} from the code. |
- 2005: René L. Schilling: Measures, Integrals and Martingales ... (previous) ... (next): $3.1$
- 2013: Donald L. Cohn: Measure Theory (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $1.1$: Algebras and Sigma-Algebras
- 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): measurable set