Definition:Symmetric Relation

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Definition

Let $\RR \subseteq S \times S$ be a relation in $S$.


Definition 1

$\RR$ is symmetric if and only if:

$\tuple {x, y} \in \RR \implies \tuple {y, x} \in \RR$


Definition 2

$\RR$ is symmetric if and only if it equals its inverse:

$\RR^{-1} = \RR$


Definition 3

$\RR$ is symmetric if and only if it is a subset of its inverse:

$\RR \subseteq \RR^{-1}$


Class Theory

In the context of class theory, the definition follows the same lines:

Let $V$ be a basic universe.

Let $\RR \subseteq V \times V$ be a relation in $V$.


$\RR$ is symmetric if and only if:

$\tuple {x, y} \in \RR \implies \tuple {y, x} \in \RR$


Examples

Brotherhood Relation

Let $P$ be the set of male people.

Let $\sim$ be the relation on $P$ defined as:

$\forall \tuple {x, y} \in P \times P: x \sim y \iff \text { $x$ is a brother of $y$}$

Then $\sim$ is a symmetric relation.


This does not hold if $P$ is the set of all people.

Because if $a$ is male and $b$ are brother and sister, then:

$a \sim b$

but:

$b \not \sim a$


Opposite Gender Relation

Let $P$ be the set of people.

Let $\sim$ be the relation on $P$ defined as:

$\forall \tuple {x, y} \in P \times P: x \sim y \iff \text { $x$ of the opposite gender to $y$}$

(This assumes that gender is binary and well-defined.)

Then $\sim$ is a symmetric relation.

However, $\sim$ is antireflexive and antitransitive.


Distance Less than 1

Let $\sim$ be the relation on the set of real numbers $\R$ defined as:

$x \sim y \iff \size {x - y} < 1$

Then $\sim$ is symmetric and reflexive, but not transitive.


Also see

  • Results about symmetric relations can be found here.