Equivalence of Definitions of Associate in Integral Domain

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

The following definitions of the concept of Associate in the context of Integral Domain are equivalent:

Let $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ be an integral domain.

Let $x, y \in D$.

Definition 1

$x$ is an associate of $y$ (in $D$) if and only if they are both divisors of each other.

That is, $x$ and $y$ are associates (in $D$) if and only if $x \divides y$ and $y \divides x$.

Definition 2

$x$ and $y$ are associates (in $D$) if and only if:

$\ideal x = \ideal y$

where $\ideal x$ and $\ideal y$ denote the ideals generated by $x$ and $y$ respectively.

Definition 3

$x$ and $y$ are associates (in $D$) if and only if there exists a unit $u$ of $\struct {D, +, \circ}$ such that:

$y = u \circ x$

and consequently:

$x = u^{-1} \circ y$


That is, if and only if $x$ and $y$ are unit multiples of each other.


Proof

$(1)$ is Equivalent to $(2)$

We are to show that:

$x \divides y \text{ and } y \divides x \iff \ideal x = \ideal y$


Thus:

\(\ds \) \(\) \(\ds x \divides y \text{ and } y \divides x\) Definition 1 of Associate in Integral Domain
\(\ds \) \(\leadstoandfrom\) \(\ds \ideal y \subseteq \ideal x \text{ and } \ideal x \subseteq \ideal y\) Element in Integral Domain is Divisor iff Principal Ideal is Superset
\(\ds \) \(\leadstoandfrom\) \(\ds \ideal x = \ideal y\) Definition 2 of Set Equality

$\blacksquare$


$(1)$ is Equivalent to $(3)$

\(\ds y\) \(=\) \(\ds u \circ x\)
\(\ds \leadstoandfrom \ \ \) \(\ds x\) \(=\) \(\ds u^{-1} \circ y\) Definition of Unit of Ring

By the definition of divisor:

$x \divides y$ and $y \divides x$

$\Box$


Let $x \divides y$ and $y \divides x$.

Then $\exists s, t \in D$ such that:

$(1): \quad y = t \circ x$

and:

$(2): \quad x = s \circ y$

If either $x = 0_D$ or $y = 0_D$, then so must be the other (as an integral domain has no zero divisors by definition).

So $x = 1_D \circ y$ and $y = 1_D \circ x$, and the result holds.


Otherwise:

\(\ds 1_D \circ x\) \(=\) \(\ds x\) Definition of Unity of Ring
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds s \circ y\) from $(2)$
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds s \circ \paren {t \circ x}\) from $(1)$
\(\ds \) \(=\) \(\ds \paren {s \circ t} \circ x\) Definition of Associative Operation


So:

$s \circ t = 1_D$

and both $s \in U_D$ and $t \in U_D$.

The result follows.

$\blacksquare$