Equivalence of Definitions of Bounded Lattice

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search



Theorem

The following definitions of the concept of Bounded Lattice are equivalent:

Definition 1

Let $\struct {S, \preceq}$ be an ordered set.

Let $S$ admit all finite suprema and finite infima.

Let $\vee$ and $\wedge$ be the join and meet operations on $S$, respectively.


Then the ordered structure $\struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ is a bounded lattice.

Definition 2

Let $\struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ be a lattice.

Let $\vee$ and $\wedge$ have identity elements $\bot$ and $\top$ respectively.


Then $\struct {S, \vee, \wedge, \preceq}$ is a bounded lattice.

Definition 3

Let $\struct {S, \wedge, \vee, \preceq}$ be a lattice.

Let $S$ be bounded in $\struct {S, \preceq}$.


Then $\struct {S, \wedge, \vee, \preceq}$ is a bounded lattice.


Proof

Definition 1 if and only if Definition 2

From Supremum of Empty Set is Smallest Element, we have that:

$\bot := \sup \O$

satisfies $\bot \preceq a$ for all $a \in S$.


From Join Semilattice has Smallest Element iff has Identity:

$\bot$ is an identity element for $\vee$, and conversely.


That $\inf \O$ is an identity element for $\wedge$, and conversely, follows by the Duality Principle.

Hence the result.

$\Box$


Definition 1 if and only if Definition 3

Let $x \in S$.


From Supremum of Empty Set is Smallest Element:

$x = \sup \O$ if and only if $x$ is the smallest element of $\struct{S, \preceq}$


From Ordered Set has Lower Bound iff has Smallest Element:

$x$ is the smallest element of $\struct{S, \preceq}$ if and only if $x$ is a lower bound of $S$ in $\struct{S, \preceq}$


That $\inf \O$ is an upper bound for $S$, and conversely, follows by the Duality Principle.


Hence the result.

$\blacksquare$


Also see