Equivalence of Definitions of Isometry of Metric Spaces

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

The following definitions of the concept of Isometry in the context of Metric Spaces are equivalent:

Definition 1

Let $M_1 = \tuple {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \tuple {A_2, d_2}$ be metric spaces or pseudometric spaces.


Let $\phi: A_1 \to A_2$ be a bijection such that:

$\forall a, b \in A_1: \map {d_1} {a, b} = \map {d_2} {\map \phi a, \map \phi b}$


Then $\phi$ is called an isometry.

That is, an isometry is a distance-preserving bijection.

Definition 2

Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be metric spaces or pseudometric spaces.


$M_1$ and $M_2$ are isometric if and only if there exist inverse mappings $\phi: A_1 \to A_2$ and $\phi^{-1}: A_2 \to A_1$ such that:
$\forall a, b \in A_1: \map {d_1} {a, b} = \map {d_2} {\map \phi a, \map \phi b}$
and:
$\forall u, v \in A_2: \map {d_2} {u, v} = \map {d_1} {\map {\phi^{-1} } u, \map {\phi^{-1} } v}$


Let $M_1 = \struct {A_1, d_1}$ and $M_2 = \struct {A_2, d_2}$ be metric spaces or pseudometric spaces.

Let $\phi: M_1 \to M_2$ be an isometry.


Then its inverse $\phi^{-1}: M_2 \to M_1$ is likewise an isometry.


Proof

$(1)$ implies $(2)$

Let $\phi: M_1 \to M_2$ be an isometry by definition 1.

Then by definition:

$\phi$ is a bijection such that:
$\forall a, b \in A_1: \map {d_1} {a, b} = \map {d_2} {\map \phi a, \map \phi b}$


By Inverse of Bijection is Bijection, $\phi^{-1}$ is also a bijection.

Thus $\forall a, b \in A_2$ there exists $\map {\phi^{-1} } a$ and $\map {\phi^{-1} } b$ in $A_1$.

From Inverse of Inverse of Bijection:

$\forall a, b \in A_2: \map {d_2} {\map \phi {\map {\phi^{-1} } a}, \map \phi {\map {\phi^{-1} } b} } = \map {d_1} {\map {\phi^{-1} } a, \map {\phi^{-1} } b}$

and so:

$\forall a, b \in A_2: \map {d_2} {a, b} = \map {d_1} {\map {\phi^{-1} } a, \map {\phi^{-1} } b}$


Thus $M_1$ and $M_2$ are isometric by definition 2.

$\Box$


$(2)$ implies $(1)$

Let $M_1$ and $M_2$ be isometric by definition 2.

Then by definition:

there exist inverse mappings $\phi: A_1 \to A_2$ and $\phi^{-1}: A_2 \to A_1$ such that:
$\forall a, b \in A_1: \map {d_1} {a, b} = \map {d_2} {\map \phi a, \map \phi b}$
and:
$\forall u, v \in A_2: \map {d_2} {u, v} = \map {d_1} {\map {\phi^{-1} } u, \map {\phi^{-1} } v}$

By Inverse of Bijection is Bijection, $\phi$ and $\phi^{-1}$ are both bijections.


Thus $\phi: M_1 \to M_2$ is a isometry by definition 1.

$\blacksquare$


Sources