Exchange of Order of Summation/Example

Theorem

Let $R: \Z \to \set {\T, \F}$ and $S: \Z \to \set {\T, \F}$ be propositional functions on the set of integers.

Let $\ds \sum_{\map R i} x_i$ denote a summation over $R$.

Let the fiber of truth of both $R$ and $S$ be infinite.

Then it is not necessarily the case that:

$\ds \sum_{\map R i} \sum_{\map S j} a_{i j} = \sum_{\map S j} \sum_{\map R i} a_{i j}$

Proof

Proof by Counterexample:

This theorem requires a proof. In particular: No idea at the moment. Have to find a series of $a_{i j}$ which is conditionally convergent for a start. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by crafting such a proof. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{ProofWanted}} from the code. If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page.

Sources

• 1997: Donald E. Knuth: The Art of Computer Programming: Volume 1: Fundamental Algorithms (3rd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.2.3$: Sums and Products: Exercise $8$