Fermat's Two Squares Theorem
Theorem
Let $p$ be a prime number.
Then $p$ can be expressed as the sum of two squares if and only if either:
- $p = 2$
or:
- $p \equiv 1 \pmod 4$
The expression of a prime of the form $4 k + 1$ as the sum of two squares is unique except for the order of the two summands.
Proof
Proof of Existence
There are three possibilities for a prime:
- $(1): \quad p = 2$
or:
- $(2): \quad p \equiv 1 \pmod 4$
or:
- $(3): \quad p \equiv 3 \pmod 4$
Necessary Condition
Suppose $p$ can be expressed as the sum of two squares.
First we note that $2 = 1^2 + 1^2$, which is the sum of two squares.
This disposes of the case where $p = 2$.
Let $p = a^2 + b^2$.
From Sum of Two Squares not Congruent to 3 modulo 4, $p \not \equiv 3 \pmod 4$ whatever $a$ and $b$ are.
So either $p = 2$, or $p \equiv 1 \pmod 4$.
Sufficient Condition
We have already noted that $2 = 1^2 + 1^2$, which is the sum of two squares.
Let $p$ be a prime number of the form $p \equiv 1 \pmod 4$.
Suppose $m p = x^2 + y^2$ has a solution such that $1 < m < p$.
Let $u, v$ be the least absolute residues modulo $m$ of $x$ and $y$ respectively.
That is:
- $u \equiv x, v \equiv y \pmod m: \dfrac {-m} 2 < u, v \le \dfrac m 2$
Then:
- $u^2 + v^2 \equiv x^2 + y^2 \pmod m$
Thus:
- $\exists r \in \Z, r \ge 0: u^2 + v^2 = m r$
We are going to establish a descent step.
That is, we aim to show that $r p$ is the sum of two squares with $1 \le r < m$.
First we show that $r$ does lie in this range.
If $r = 0$ then $u = v = 0$ and so $m$ divides both $x$ and $y$.
But then from $m p = x^2 + y^2$ we have that $m \divides p$.
This cannot happen as $p$ is prime.
So:
- $1 \le r = \dfrac {u^2 + v^2} m \le \dfrac 1 m \times \paren {\dfrac {m^2} 4 + \dfrac {n^2} 4} = \dfrac m 2 < m$
So $1 \le r < m$.
Now we show that $r p$ is the sum of two squares.
Multiplying $m p = x^2 + y^2$ and $m r = u^2 + v^2$:
\(\ds m^2 r p\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {x^2 + y^2} \paren {u^2 + v^2}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {x u + y v}^2 + \paren {x v - y u}^2\) | Brahmagupta-Fibonacci Identity |
Now:
- $x u + y v \equiv x^2 + y^2 \equiv 0 \pmod m$, so $m \divides x u + y v$
- $x v - y u \equiv x y - x y \equiv 0 \pmod m$, so $m \divides x v - y u$
So, putting $m X = x u + y v, m Y = x v - y u$, we get:
- $m^2 r p = m^2 X^2 + m^2 Y^2$
That is:
- $r p = X^2 + Y^2$
Hence the descent step is established.
Next we need to show that $m p = x^2 + y^2$ has a solution for some $m$ with $1 \le m < p$.
From First Supplement to Law of Quadratic Reciprocity, we have that $-1$ is a quadratic residue for each prime $p \equiv 1 \pmod 4$.
Hence the congruence $x^2 + 1 \equiv 0 \pmod p$ has a least positive solution $x_1$ such that $1 \le x_1 \le p - 1$.
So there exists a positive integer $m$ such that $m p = x_1^2 + 1^2$.
This is just what we want, because:
- $m = \dfrac {x_1^2 + 1^2} p \le \dfrac {\paren {p - 1}^2 + 1} p = \dfrac {p^2 - 2 \paren {p - 1}^2} p < p$
If this solution has $m > 1$, then our descent step (above) guarantees a solution for a smaller positive value of $m$.
Eventually we will reach a solution with $m = 1$, that is:
- $p = x^2 + y^2$
$\blacksquare$
Proof of Uniqueness
Let $p$ be prime such that $p \equiv 1 \pmod 4$.
Suppose $p = a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2$ where $a > b > 0$ and $c > d > 0$.
We are going to show that $a = c$ and $b = d$.
From the two expressions for $p$, we have:
\(\ds \paren {a d - b c} \paren {a d + b c}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds a^2 d^2 - b^2 c^2\) | Difference of Two Squares | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {p - b^2} d^2 - b^2 \paren {p - d^2}\) | substituting for $a^2$ and $c^2$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds p d^2 - b^2 d^2 - p b^2 + b^2 d^2\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds p \paren {d^2 - b^2}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\equiv\) | \(\ds 0\) | $\pmod p$ |
So we have:
- $\paren {a d - b c} \paren {a d + b c} \equiv 0 \pmod p$
From Euclid's Lemma, that means:
- $p \divides \paren {a d - b c}$
or:
- $p \divides \paren {a d + b c}$
So, suppose $p \divides \paren {a d + b c}$.
Now, we have that each of $a^2, b^2, c^2, d^2$ must be less than $p$.
Hence $0 < a, b, c, d < \sqrt p$.
This implies $0 < a d + b c < 2p$.
That must mean that $a d + b c = p$.
But then:
\(\ds p^2\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {a^2 + b^2} \paren {d^2 + c^2}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {a d + b c}^2 + \paren {a c - b d}^2\) | Brahmagupta-Fibonacci Identity | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds p^2 + \paren {a c - b d}^2\) |
That means:
- $a c - b d = 0$
But since $a > b$ and $c > d$ we have:
- $a c > b d$
This contradiction shows that $a d + b c$ can not be divisible by $p$.
So this means:
- $p \divides \paren {a d - b c}$
Similarly, because $0 < a, b, c, d < \sqrt p$ we have:
- $-p < a d - b c < p$
This means:
- $a d = b c$
So:
- $a \divides b c$
But $a \perp b$ otherwise $a^2 + b^2$ has a common divisor greater than $1$ and less than $p$.
This cannot happen because $p$ is prime.
So by Euclid's Lemma:
- $a \divides c$
So we can put $c = k a$ and so $a d = b c$ becomes $d = k b$.
Hence:
- $p = c^2 + d^2 = k^2 \paren {a^2 + b^2} = k^2 p$
This means $k = 1$ which means $a = c$ and $b = d$ as we wanted to show.
$\blacksquare$
Also known as
It is also known as just the Two Squares Theorem.
Also see
Source of Name
This entry was named for Pierre de Fermat.
Sources
- 1937: Eric Temple Bell: Men of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text{IV}$: The Prince of Amateurs
- 1972: George F. Simmons: Differential Equations ... (previous) ... (next): $1$: The Nature of Differential Equations: $\S 6$: The Brachistochrone. Fermat and the Bernoullis
- 1986: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers ... (previous) ... (next): $13$
- 1992: George F. Simmons: Calculus Gems ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {B}.2$: More about Numbers: Irrationals, Perfect Numbers and Mersenne Primes
- 1997: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $13$
- 2008: Ian Stewart: Taming the Infinite ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $7$: Patterns in Numbers: Fermat