General Variation of Integral Functional/Dependent on N Functions/Canonical Variables
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $\delta J$ be a general variation of integral functional dependent on n functions.
Suppose a following coordinate transformation is done:
- $\set {x, \ldots y_i, \ldots, \ldots, y_i', \ldots, F} \to \set {x, \ldots, y_i, \ldots, \ldots p', \ldots, H}, i = \tuple {1, \ldots, n}$
Then, in canonical variables:
- $\ds \delta J = \int_{x_0}^{x_1} \sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n \paren {F_{y_i} - \dfrac {\d {p_i} } {\d x} } \map {h_i} x \rd x + \intlimits {\sum_{i \mathop = 1}^n p_i \delta y_i - H \delta x} {x \mathop = x_0} {x \mathop = x_1}$
where:
\(\ds \bigvalueat {\delta x} {x \mathop = x_j}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \delta x_j\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \bigvalueat {\delta y_i} {x \mathop = x_j}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \delta_i^j\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds j\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \tuple {0, 1}\) |
This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: the meaning of $j = \tuple {0, 1}$ in this context, and hence the meaning of $x_j$ and $\delta x_j$, and also $\delta_i^j$, all of which are obscure You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
Proof
This theorem requires a proof. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by crafting such a proof. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{ProofWanted}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |
Sources
- 1963: I.M. Gelfand and S.V. Fomin: Calculus of Variations ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 3.13$: Derivation of the Basic Formula