Initial Segment of Ordinals under Lexicographic Order
![]() | This article needs proofreading. Please check it for mathematical errors. If you believe there are none, please remove {{Proofread}} from the code.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Proofread}} from the code. |
Theorem
Let $\preccurlyeq_l$ denote the lexicographic order for the set $\paren {\On \times \On}$.
Let the ordinal number $1$ denote the successor of $\O$.
Then the initial segment of $\tuple {1, \O}$ with respect to the lexicographic order $\preccurlyeq_l$ is a proper class.
This initial segment shall be denoted $\paren {\On \times \On}_{\tuple {1, \O} }$.
![]() | This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: The connection between these two statements is not clear. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
Proof
Define the mapping $F: \On \to \On \times \On$ as:
- $\forall x \in \On: \map F x = \tuple {\O, x}$
Then, $F: \On \to \paren {\On \times \On}_{\tuple {1, \O} }$, since $\O < 1$.
![]() | This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: The above statement does not make linguistic sense. The entity $F: \On \to \paren {\On \times \On}_{\tuple {1, \O} }$ is a noun, and there is no verb in the "then" clause. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
That is, $F$ is a mapping from the class of all ordinals to the initial segment of $\tuple {1, \O}$ with respect to lexicographic order.
By Equality of Ordered Pairs, $F$ is injective.
But since $\On$ is a proper class by the Burali-Forti Paradox, the initial segment of $\tuple {1, \O}$ is a proper class as well.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1971: Gaisi Takeuti and Wilson M. Zaring: Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory: $\S 7.54 \ (2)$