Integers whose Number of Representations as Sum of Two Primes is Maximum
Theorem
$210$ is the largest integer which can be represented as the sum of two primes in the maximum number of ways.
The full list of such numbers is as follows:
- $1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 60, 90, 210$
This sequence is A141340 in the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (N. J. A. Sloane (Ed.), 2008).
The list contains:
- $n \le 8$
- $n \le 18$ where $2 \divides n$
- $n \le 48$ where $2 \times 3 \divides n$
- $n \le 90$ where $2 \times 3 \times 5 \divides n$
- $210 = 2 \times 3 \times 5 \times 7$
Sufficient Condition
Let $n$ be a (strictly) positive integer.
Suppose we have for some positive integer $k$:
- $p_k \# \divides n$
- $n \le 2 {p_{k + 1} }^2$
where $p_k \#$ denotes the product of the first $k$ primes.
Then $n$ can be represented as the sum of two primes in the maximum number of ways.
Proof
From Number of Representations as Sum of Two Primes, the number of ways an integer $n$ can be represented as the sum of two primes is no greater than the number of primes in the interval $\closedint {\dfrac n 2} {n - 2}$.
The interval $\closedint {\dfrac {210} 2} {210 - 2}$ is $\closedint {105} {208}$.
The primes in this interval can be enumerated:
- $107, 109, 113, 127, 131, 137, 139, 149, 151, 157, 163, 167, 173, 179, 181, 191, 193, 197, 199$
It can be seen there are exactly $19$ of them.
We have:
\(\ds 11 + 199\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 13 + 197\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 17 + 193\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 19 + 191\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 29 + 181\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 31 + 179\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 37 + 173\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 43 + 167\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 47 + 163\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 53 + 157\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 59 + 151\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 61 + 149\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 71 + 139\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 73 + 137\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 79 + 131\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 83 + 127\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 97 + 113\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 101 + 109\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds 103 + 107\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 210\) |
and as can be seen, there are $19$ such representations, one for each prime in $\closedint {105} {208}$.
This theorem requires a proof. In particular: It remains to be shown that $210$ is the largest number that can be represented by the maximum of these. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by crafting such a proof. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{ProofWanted}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |
Sources
- July 1993: Jean-Marc Deshouillers, Andrew Granville, Wladyslaw Narkiewicz and Carl Pomerance: An Upper Bound in Goldbach's Problem (Math. Comp. Vol. 61, no. 203: pp. 209 – 213) www.jstor.org/stable/2152947
- 1997: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $210$