Internal Direct Product/Examples/Non-Example 1
Example of External Direct Product which is not Internal Direct Product
Let $m$ and $n$ be integers such that $m, n > 1$.
Let $S$ be a set with $n$ elements.
Let $A$ and $B$ be subsets of $S$ which have $m$ and $n$ elements respectively.
Let $\struct {S, \gets}$ be the algebraic structure formed from $S$ with the left operation.
Then:
- $\struct {S, \gets}$ is isomorphic with the external direct product of $\struct {A, \gets_A}$ and $\struct {B, \gets_B}$
but:
- $\struct {S, \gets}$ is not the internal direct product of $\struct {A, \gets_A}$ and $\struct {B, \gets_B}$.
Proof
From Cardinality of Cartesian Product of Finite Sets, $S$ has the same number of elements as the Cartesian product of $A$ and $B$.
That is:
- $\card {\struct {S, \gets} } = \card {\struct {A, \gets_A} \times \struct {B, \gets_B} }$
Hence by definition of cardinality, there exists a bijection between $S$ and $A \times B$.
Indeed, from Cardinality of Set of Bijections, there are $m n!$ such bijections.
First we demonstrate that $\struct {S, \gets}$ is isomorphic with the external direct product of $\struct {A, \gets_A}$ and $\struct {B, \gets_B}$.
Let $\phi: A \times B \to S$ be an arbitrary bijection.
We have:
\(\ds \forall \tuple {a, b}, \tuple {c, d} \in A \times B: \, \) | \(\ds \) | \(\) | \(\ds \map \phi {\tuple {a, b} \gets \tuple {c, d} }\) | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \phi {a \gets c, b \gets d}\) | Definition of External Direct Product | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \phi {c, d}\) | Definition of Left Operation | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \phi {a, b} \gets \map \phi {c, d}\) | Definition of Left Operation |
demonstrating isomorphism.
$\Box$
Let $\phi: A \times B \to S$ be the mapping defined as:
- $\map \phi {a, b} = a \gets b$
Let $\tuple {a, b}$ and $\tuple {c, b}$ be arbitrary elements of $A \times B$ such that $a \ne c$.
As the cardinality of $A$ is greater than $1$, it is apparent that this is possible.
Thus:
- $\tuple {a, b} \ne \tuple {c, b}$
But we have:
\(\ds \map \phi {a, b}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds a \gets b\) | Definition of $\phi$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds b\) | Definition of $\gets$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds c \gets b\) | Definition of $\gets$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \phi {c, b}\) | Definition of $\phi$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \map \phi {a, b}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \phi {c, b}\) |
demonstrating that $\phi$ is not an injection.
Thus $\phi$ is not a bijection.
Hence by definition $\phi$ is not an isomorphism.
It follows that there can be no isomorphism from $\struct {A, \gets_A} \times \struct {B, \gets_B}$ to $\struct {S, \gets}$.
That is, $\struct {S, \gets}$ is not the internal direct product of $\struct {A, \gets_A}$ and $\struct {B, \gets_B}$.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {II}$: New Structures from Old: $\S 13$: Compositions Induced on Cartesian Products and Function Spaces: Exercise $13.8$