Inverse is Mapping implies Mapping is Injection/Proof 1

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

Let $S$ and $T$ be sets.

Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping.

Let the inverse $f^{-1} \subseteq T \times S$ itself be a mapping.


Then $f$ is an injection.


Proof

Let $f^{-1}: T \to S$ be a mapping.


Let $\map f {x_a} = y$ and $\map f {x_b} = y$.

Then:

\(\ds \tuple {x_a, y}\) \(\in\) \(\ds f\) Definition of Mapping
\(\, \ds \land \, \) \(\ds \tuple {x_b, y}\) \(\in\) \(\ds f\)
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) \(\ds \tuple {y, x_a}\) \(\in\) \(\ds f^{-1}\) Definition of Inverse of Mapping
\(\, \ds \land \, \) \(\ds \tuple {y, x_b}\) \(\in\) \(\ds f^{-1}\)
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) \(\ds x_a\) \(=\) \(\ds x_b\) Definition 4 of Mapping: $f^{-1}$ is many-to-one

Thus, by definition, $f$ is an injection.

$\blacksquare$