Reflexive Relation/Examples/Reflexive Relation on Cartesian Plane

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Examples of Use of Symmetric and Transitive Relation is not necessarily Reflexive

The subset of the Cartesian plane defined as:

$\RR := \set {\tuple {x, y} \in \R^2: x \le y \le x + 1}$

determines a relation on $\R^2$ which is reflexive, but neither symmetric nor transitive.


Proof

Reflexive Relation

We note that, by definition:

$\forall x \in \R: \tuple {x, y} \in \RR$ such that $x = y$

and so:

$\forall x \in \R: \tuple {x, x} \in \RR$

Hence $\RR$ is reflexive.

$\Box$


Non-Symmetric Relation

Proof by Counterexample:

\(\ds 0 \le 0 + 1\) \(\le\) \(\ds 0 + 1\)
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) \(\ds \tuple {0, 1}\) \(\in\) \(\ds \RR\)

But:

$1 > 0$

and so:

$\tuple {1, 0} \notin \RR$

thus demonstrating that $\RR$ is not symmetric.

$\Box$


Non-Transitive Relation

Proof by Counterexample:

\(\ds \tuple {0, 1}\) \(\in\) \(\ds \RR\)
\(\, \ds \land \, \) \(\ds \tuple {1, 2}\) \(\in\) \(\ds \RR\)

but

$\tuple {0, 2} \notin \RR$

thus demonstrating that $\RR$ is not transitive.

$\Box$


The relation $\RR$ is illustrated below:

Reflexive-NonSymmetric-NonTransitive.png

$\blacksquare$


Sources