Semilattice has Unique Ordering such that Operation is Supremum
Theorem
Let $\struct {S, \vee}$ be a semilattice.
Then there exists a unique ordering $\preccurlyeq$ on $S$ such that:
- $x \vee y = \sup \set {x, y}$
where $\sup \set {x, y}$ is the supremum of $\set {x, y}$ with respect to $\preccurlyeq$.
Proof
Let us define a relation $\RR$ on $S$ as:
- $\forall x, y \in S: x \mathrel \RR y \iff x \vee y = y$
From Semilattice Induces Ordering, we have that $\RR$ is an ordering.
Let us denote this ordering by $\preccurlyeq$, and recall its definition:
- $x \vee y = y \iff x \preccurlyeq y$
Supremum
Let $x, y \in S$ be arbitrary.
Let $x \vee y = z$.
We have:
\(\ds x \vee y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds z\) | by supposition | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x \vee \paren {x \vee y}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \vee z\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \paren {x \vee x} \vee y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \vee z\) | Semilattice Axiom $\text {SL} 1$: Associativity | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x \vee y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \vee z\) | Semilattice Axiom $\text {SL} 3$: Idempotence | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds z\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \vee z\) | by hypothesis | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x\) | \(\preccurlyeq\) | \(\ds z\) | Definition of $\preccurlyeq$ | |||||||||||
and: | |||||||||||||||
\(\ds x \vee y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds z\) | by supposition | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \paren {x \vee y} \vee y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds z \vee y\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x \vee \paren {y \vee y}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds z \vee y\) | Semilattice Axiom $\text {SL} 1$: Associativity | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x \vee y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds z \vee y\) | Semilattice Axiom $\text {SL} 3$: Idempotence | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds z\) | \(=\) | \(\ds y \vee z\) | by hypothesis, and Semilattice Axiom $\text {SL} 2$: Commutativity | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds y\) | \(\preccurlyeq\) | \(\ds z\) | Definition of $\preccurlyeq$ |
Hence we see that $x \vee y$ is an upper bound of $\set {x, y}$ with respect to $\preccurlyeq$.
Now let $w$ be an arbitrary upper bound of $\set {x, y}$ with respect to $\preccurlyeq$.
That is:
- $x \preccurlyeq w$ and $y \preccurlyeq w$
Then:
\(\ds x \vee w\) | \(=\) | \(\ds w\) | Definition of $\preccurlyeq$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds y \vee w\) | \(=\) | \(\ds w\) | Definition of $\preccurlyeq$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x \vee \paren {y \vee w}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \vee w\) | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \paren {x \vee y} \vee w\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \vee w\) | Semilattice Axiom $\text {SL} 1$: Associativity | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds z \vee w\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \vee w\) | as $x \vee y = z$ | ||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds w\) | a priori | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds z\) | \(\preccurlyeq\) | \(\ds w\) | Definition of $\preccurlyeq$ |
So:
- $x \vee y$ is an upper bound of $\set {x, y}$ with respect to $\preccurlyeq$
- for every upper bound $w$ of $\set {x, y}$ with respect to $\preccurlyeq$, we have that $x \vee y \preccurlyeq w$
Hence, by definition, $x \vee y$ is the supremum of $\set {x, y}$ with respect to $\preccurlyeq$.
$\Box$
Uniqueness
It remains to be proved that the ordering $\preccurlyeq$, with the property that:
- $x \vee y = \sup \set {x, y}_\preccurlyeq$
is unique.
Indeed, suppose there exists another ordering $\preccurlyeq'$ such that:
- $x \vee y = \sup \set {x, y}_{\preccurlyeq'}$
We have:
\(\ds \sup \set {x, y}_{\preccurlyeq'}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x \vee y\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sup \set {x, y}_\preccurlyeq\) | as $x \vee y$ is uniquely defined |
The proof is complete.
$\blacksquare$
Also see
Sources
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {III}$: The Natural Numbers: $\S 14$: Orderings: Exercise $14.22 \ \text {(b)}$