Side of Area Contained by Rational Straight Line and Second Apotome

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

In the words of Euclid:

If an area be contained by a rational straight line and a second apotome, the "side" of the area is a first apotome of a medial straight line.

(The Elements: Book $\text{X}$: Proposition $92$)


Proof

Euclid-X-92.png

Let the area $AB$ be contained by the rational straight line $AC$ and the second apotome $AD$.

It is to be proved that the "side" of $AB$ is a first apotome of a medial straight line.


Let $DG$ be the annex of the second apotome $AD$.

Then, by definition:

$AG$ and $GD$ are rational straight lines which are commensurable in square only
the annex $DG$ is commensurable with the rational straight line $AC$
the square on the whole $AG$ is greater than the square on the annex $GD$ by the square on a straight line which is commensurable in length with $AG$.


Let there be applied to $AG$ a parallelogram equal to the fourth part of the square on $GD$ and deficient by a square figure.

From Proposition $17$ of Book $\text{X} $: Condition for Commensurability of Roots of Quadratic Equation:

that parallelogram divides $AG$ into commensurable parts.


Let $DG$ be bisected at $E$.

Let the rectangle contained by $AF$ and $FG$ be applied to $AG$ which is equal to the square on $EG$ and deficient by a square figure.

Therefore $AF$ is commensurable with $FG$.

Therefore from Proposition $15$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurability of Sum of Commensurable Magnitudes:

$AG$ is commensurable with each of $AF$ and $FG$.

But $AG$ is incommensurable with $AC$.

Therefore from Proposition $13$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurable Magnitudes are Incommensurable with Same Magnitude:

each of the straight lines $AF$ and $FG$ is rational and incommensurable in length with $AC$.

Therefore from Proposition $21$ of Book $\text{X} $: Medial is Irrational:

each of the rectangles $AI$ and $FK$ is medial.


We have that $DE$ is commensurable in length with $EG$.

Therefore from Proposition $15$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurability of Sum of Commensurable Magnitudes:

$DG$ is also commensurable in length with each of the straight lines $DE$ and $EG$.

But $DG$ is commensurable in length with $AC$.

Therefore from Proposition $19$ of Book $\text{X} $: Product of Rationally Expressible Numbers is Rational:

each of the rectangles $DH$ and $EK$ is rational.


Let the square $LM$ be constructed equal to $AI$.

Let the square $NO$ be subtracted from $LM$ having the common angle $\angle LPM$ equal to $FK$.

Therefore from Proposition $26$ of Book $\text{VI} $: Parallelogram Similar and in Same Angle has Same Diameter:

the squares $LM$ and $NO$ are about the same diameter.

Let $PR$ be the diameter of $LM$ and $NO$.

We have that $AI$ and $FK$ are medial.

We have that:

$AI$ equals the square on $LP$

and:

$KF$ equals the square on $PN$.

Thus the squares on $LP$ and $PN$ are medial.

Therefore $LP$ and $PN$ are medial straight lines which are commensurable in square only.

We have that the rectangle contained by $AF$ and $FG$ equals the square on $EG$.

Therefore from Proposition $17$ of Book $\text{VI} $: Rectangles Contained by Three Proportional Straight Lines:

$AF : EG = EG : FG$

But we also have:

$AF : EG = AI : EK$

And from Proposition $1$ of Book $\text{VI} $: Areas of Triangles and Parallelograms Proportional to Base:

$EG : FG = EK : KF$

Therefore from Proposition $11$ of Book $\text{V} $: Equality of Ratios is Transitive:

$AI : EK = EK : FK$

Therefore $EK$ is a mean proportional between $AI$ and $FK$.

But from Lemma to Proposition $54$ of Book $\text{X} $: Root of Area contained by Rational Straight Line and First Binomial:

$MN$ is a mean proportional between $LM$ and $NO$.

We have that:

$AI$ equals the square $LM$

and:

$KF$ equals the square $NO$.

Therefore:

$MN = EK$

But:

$EK = DH$

and:

$MN = LO$

Therefore $DK$ equals the gnomon $UVW$ and $NO$.

But:

$AK$ equals the squares $LM$ and $NO$.

Therefore the remainder $AB$ equals $ST$.

But $ST$ is the square on $LN$.

Therefore the square on $LN$ equals $AB$.

Therefore $LN$ is the "side" of $AB$.


Now it is to be shown that $LN$ is a first apotome of a medial straight line.

We have that $EK$ is rational and equal to $LO$.

Therefore $LO$, which equals the rectangle contained by $LP$ and $PN$, is rational.

But $NO$ was proved to be medial.

Therefore $LO$ is incommensurable with $NO$.

But from Proposition $1$ of Book $\text{VI} $: Areas of Triangles and Parallelograms Proportional to Base:

$LO : NO = LP : PN$

Therefore from Proposition $11$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurability of Elements of Proportional Magnitudes:

$LP$ is incommensurable in length with $PN$.

We have that both $LP$ and $PN$ are medial.

Thus $LP$ and $PN$ are medial straight lines which contain a rational rectangle.

Therefore by definition $LN$ is a first apotome of a medial straight line.

But $LN$ is the "side" of the area $AB$.

Hence the result.

$\blacksquare$


Historical Note

This proof is Proposition $92$ of Book $\text{X}$ of Euclid's The Elements.
It is the converse of Proposition $98$: Square on First Apotome of Medial Straight Line applied to Rational Straight Line.


Sources