Supremum Operator Norm Need not be Attained
Theorem
Let $\Bbb K \in \set {\R, \C}$.
Let $\sequence {\lambda_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a bounded sequence in $\Bbb K$ such that:
- $\ds \forall n \in \N_{> 0} : \lambda_n = 1 - \frac 1 n$.
Let $\struct {\ell^2, \norm {\, \cdot \,}_2}$ be the normed $2$-sequence space.
Let $\mathbf x = \tuple {a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots} \in \ell^2$.
Suppose $\Lambda : \ell^2 \to \ell^2$ is a diagonal operator such that:
- $\Lambda \tuple {a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots} = \tuple {\lambda_1 a_1, \lambda_2 a_2, \lambda_3 a_3, \ldots}$
Then there is no $\mathbf x \in \ell^2$ such that:
- $\norm {\mathbf x}_2 \le 1$
and:
- $\norm {\Lambda \mathbf x}_2 = \norm \Lambda$
Proof
Suppose $\ds \lambda_n = 1 - \frac 1 n$ with $n \in \N_{> 0}$.
By Supremum Operator Norm of Diagonal Operator over 2-Sequence Space:
\(\ds \norm \Lambda\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sup_{n \mathop \in \N_{>0} } \set {1 - \frac 1 n}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds 1\) |
Suppose:
- $\mathbf x = \tuple {a_n}_{n \mathop \in \N_{> 0} } \in \ell^2$
such that $\norm {\mathbf x}_2 \le 1$ and $\norm {\Lambda \mathbf x}_2 = 1$.
Suppose $0 = a_2 = a_3 = \ldots$.
Then
\(\ds \Lambda \mathbf x\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \tuple {0 \cdot a_1, \frac 1 2 \cdot 0, \frac 2 3 \cdot 0 \ldots}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \mathbf 0\) |
Also $\norm {\Lambda \mathbf x}_2 = 0$.
This is in contradiction with the assumption $\norm {\Lambda \mathbf x}_2 = 1$.
Hence, at least one of the terms $a_2, a_3, \ldots$ must be nonzero.
However:
\(\ds 1\) | \(\ge\) | \(\ds \norm {\mathbf x}_2^2\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \size {a_1}^2 + \size {a_2}^2 + \size {a_3}^3 + \ldots\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\ge\) | \(\ds \size {a_2}^2 + \size {a_3}^3 + \ldots\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(>\) | \(\ds \frac 1 4 \size {a_2}^2 + \frac 4 9 \size {a_3}^3 + \ldots\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \norm {\Lambda \mathbf x}_2^2\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds 1\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds 1\) | \(>\) | \(\ds 1\) |
This is a contradiction.
Hence, there exists no nonzero $\mathbf x \in \ell^2$ such that $\norm {\mathbf x}_2 \le 1$ and $\norm {\Lambda \mathbf x}_2 = \norm \Lambda$.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 2017: Amol Sasane: A Friendly Approach to Functional Analysis ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\S 2.3$: The normed space $\map {CL} {X,Y}$. Operator norm and the normed space $\map {CL} {X, Y}$