Uniqueness Condition for Relation Value
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $\RR$ be a relation.
Let $\tuple {x, y} \in \RR$.
Let:
- $\exists ! y: \tuple {x, y} \in \RR$
Then:
- $\map \RR x = y$
where $\map \RR x$ denotes the image of $\RR$ at $x$.
If $y$ is not unique, then:
- $\map \RR x = \O$
Proof
\(\text {(1)}: \quad\) | \(\ds z \in \map \RR x\) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds \exists y: \paren {z \in y \land \tuple {x, y} \in \RR} \land \exists ! y: \tuple {x, y} \in \RR\) | Definition of Image of Element under Relation | ||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds \forall w: \paren {\tuple {x, w} \in \RR \iff w = y}\) | Definition of Unique and by hypothesis that $\tuple {x, y} \in \RR$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds z \in w \land \tuple {x, w} \in \RR\) | Existential Instantiation from $(1)$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds z \in y\) | Substitutivity of Equality from $z \in w \land w = y$ |
Conversely:
\(\ds z \in y\) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds \paren {z \in y \land \tuple {x, y} \in \RR}\) | by hypothesis that $\tuple {x, y} \in \RR$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\) | \(\ds \exists ! y: \tuple {x, y} \in \RR\) | by hypothesis | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds z \in \map \RR x\) | Definition of Image of Element under relation |
Generalizing:
- $\forall z: \paren {z \in y \iff z \in \map \RR x}$
Therefore:
- $y = \map \RR x$
by the definition of class equality.
$\Box$
Suppose that $\neg \exists ! y: \tuple {x, y} \in \RR$.
Then:
\(\ds \neg \exists ! y: \tuple {x, y} \in \RR\) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds z \notin \map \RR x\) | Definition of Image of Element under relation |
Thus:
- $\forall z: z \notin \map \RR x$
Therefore:
- $\map \RR x = \O$
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1971: Gaisi Takeuti and Wilson M. Zaring: Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory: $\S 6.12$