Compactness Properties Preserved under Continuous Mapping/Mistake
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Source Work
1978: Lynn Arthur Steen and J. Arthur Seebach, Jr.: Counterexamples in Topology (2nd ed.):
- Part $\text I$: Basic Definitions
- Section $3$. Compactness
- Invariance Properties
- Section $3$. Compactness
Mistake
- To be precise, the properties of compactness, $\sigma$-compactness, countable compactness, sequential compactness, Lindelöf, and separability are preserved under continuous maps ... [Weak] local compactness, and first and second countability are preserved under open continuous maps, but not just under continuous maps ...
These statements are inaccurate.
In order for a mapping to preserve these properties, it also needs to be surjective.
As an illustrative example, consider the inclusion mapping from $\closedint 0 1$ (which is compact), to $\R$ (which is not).
Also see
- Compactness Properties Preserved under Continuous Surjection
- Weak Local Compactness is Preserved under Open Continuous Surjection
- Local Compactness is Preserved under Open Continuous Surjection
- Countability Axioms Preserved under Open Continuous Surjection
Sources
- 1978: Lynn Arthur Steen and J. Arthur Seebach, Jr.: Counterexamples in Topology (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Part $\text I$: Basic Definitions: Section $3$: Compactness: Invariance Properties