Existence of Ordinal with no Surjection from Set
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $S$ be a set.
Then, there exists a non-empty ordinal $\alpha$ such that there is no surjection from $S$ to $\alpha$.
Proof
By Hartogs' Lemma, let $\alpha$ be an ordinal such that there is no injection from $\alpha$ to $\powerset S$.
From Empty Mapping is Injective, it follows that $\alpha$ is non-empty.
Aiming for a contradiction, suppose there is a surjection $\phi : S \to \alpha$.
Define $\psi : \alpha \to \powerset S$ as:
- $\map \psi \gamma = \set {x \in S : \map \phi x = \gamma}$
Let $\beta, \gamma \in \alpha$ such that:
- $\map \psi \beta = \map \psi \gamma$
Since $\phi$ is a surjection, there is some $x \in S$ such that:
- $\map \phi x = \beta$
from which it follows that:
- $x \in \map \psi \beta = \map \psi \gamma$
But then, by definition:
- $\map \phi x = \gamma$
so therefore, by definition of mapping:
- $\beta = \gamma$
Thus, by definition, $\psi$ is an injection from $\alpha$ to $\powerset S$.
This needs considerable tedious hard slog to complete it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Finish}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |