Largest Number Not Expressible as Sum of Fewer than 8 Cubes/Historical Note
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Historical Note on Largest Number Not Expressible as Sum of Fewer than 8 Cubes
David Wells made this claim without providing a source in his Curious and Interesting Numbers of $1986$.
It has not been corroborated.
Sources
- 1986: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers ... (previous) ... (next): $8042$