Quotients of Homeomorphic Spaces are Homeomorphic
Theorem
Let $X, Y$ be topological spaces.
Let $\phi : X \to Y$ be a homeomorphism from $X$ to $Y$.
Let:
- $\RR_X \subseteq X \times X$
- $\RR_Y \subseteq Y \times Y$
be equivalence relations on $X$ and $Y$, respectively.
Suppose that, for all $x, x' \in X$:
- $\map {\RR_X} {x, x'} \iff \map {\RR_Y} {\map \phi x, \map \phi {x'}}$
Then:
- $X / \RR_X \sim Y / \RR_Y$
where $\sim$ denotes homeomorphic spaces.
Proof
Let the mapping $\psi : X / \RR_X \to Y / \RR_Y$ be defined as:
- $\map \psi {\eqclass x {\RR_X}} = \eqclass {\map \phi x} {\RR_Y}$
In order for $\psi$ to be well-defined, the image needs to be independent of the choice of representative $x$.
But, for $x, x' \in X$ such that $\map {\RR_X} {x, x'}$, we have:
- $\map {\RR_Y} {\map \phi x, \map \phi {x'}}$
by hypothesis.
It follows that:
- $\eqclass {\map \phi x} {\RR_Y} = \eqclass {\map \phi {x'}} {\RR_Y}$
The inverse mapping $\psi^{-1} : Y / \RR_Y \to X / \RR_X$ can be defined as:
- $\map {\psi^{-1}} {\eqclass y {\RR_Y}} = \eqclass {\map {\phi^{-1}} y} {\RR_X}$
For the same reasons as before, $\psi^{-1}$ is well-defined.
Additionally, it is the inverse of $\psi$, since:
\(\ds \map {\psi^{-1} } {\map \psi {\eqclass x {\RR_X} } }\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map {\psi^{-1} } {\eqclass {\map \psi x} {\RR_Y} }\) | Definition of $\psi$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \eqclass {\map {\phi^{-1} } {\map \psi x} } {\RR_X}\) | Definition of $\psi^{-1}$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \eqclass x {\RR_X}\) | Definition of Inverse Mapping | |||||||||||
\(\ds \map \psi {\map {\psi^{-1} } {\eqclass y {\RR_Y} } }\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \eqclass y {\RR_Y}\) | Symmetrically |
It remains to show that $\psi$ and $\psi^{-1}$ are continuous.
Consider an arbitrary open set $U \subseteq Y / \RR_Y$.
By definition of quotient topology, we have that:
- $\map {q_{\RR_Y}^{-1}} U$
is open in $Y$, where $q_{\RR_Y}$ is the quotient mapping induced by $\RR_Y$.
Then, since $\phi$ is continuous:
- $\map {\phi^{-1}} {\map {q_{\RR_Y}^{-1}} U}$
is open in $X$.
If we can show that:
- $\map {\psi^{-1}} U = \map {\phi^{-1}} {\map {q_{\RR_Y}^{-1}} U}$
then, since $U$ was arbitrary, $\psi$ would be continuous.
We have:
\(\ds \eqclass x {\RR_X} \in \map {\psi^{-1} } U\) | \(\iff\) | \(\ds \exists \eqclass y {\RR_Y} \in U: \map {\psi^{-1} } {\eqclass y {\RR_Y} } = \eqclass x {\RR_X}\) | Definition of Image of Set under Mapping | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\iff\) | \(\ds \exists \eqclass y {\RR_Y} \in U: \eqclass {\map {\phi^{-1} } y} {\RR_X} = \eqclass x {\RR_X}\) | Definition of $\psi^{-1}$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\iff\) | \(\ds \exists y \in Y: \map {q_{\RR_Y} } y \in U \land \eqclass {\map {\phi^{-1} } y} {\RR_X} = \eqclass x {\RR_X}\) | Definition of Quotient Mapping | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\iff\) | \(\ds \exists y \in \map {q_{\RR_Y}^{-1} } U: \eqclass {\map {\phi^{-1} } y} {\RR_X} = \eqclass x {\RR_X}\) | Definition of Inverse Mapping | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\iff\) | \(\ds \eqclass x {\RR_X} \in \map {\phi^{-1} } {\map {q_{\RR_Y}^{-1} } U}\) |
Therefore, by the above remarks, $\psi$ is a continuous mapping.
By a precisely symmetric argument, it can be shown that $\psi^{-1}$ is likewise continuous.
Therefore, since $\psi$:
- is a bijection
- is continuous
- has a continuous inverse
it is a homeomorphism by definition.
$\blacksquare$