Resolvent Mapping is Analytic/Bounded Linear Operator/Proof 2
Theorem
Bounded Linear Operator
Let $B$ be a Banach space.
Let $\map \LL {B, B}$ be the set of bounded linear operators from $B$ to itself.
Let $T \in \map \LL {B, B}$.
Let $\map \rho T$ be the resolvent set of $T$ in the complex plane.
Then the resolvent mapping $f : \map \rho T \to \map \LL {B, B}$ given by $\map f z = \paren {T - z I}^{-1}$ is analytic, and:
- $\map {f'} z = \paren {T - z I}^{-2}$
where $f'$ denotes the derivative of $f$ with respect to $z$.
Banach Algebra
Let $\struct {A, \norm {\, \cdot \,} }$ be a unital Banach algebra over $\C$.
Let ${\mathbf 1}_A$ be the identity element of $A$.
Let $x \in A$.
Let $\map {\rho_A} x$ be the resolvent set of $x$ in $A$.
Define $R : \map {\rho_A} x \to A$ by:
- $\map R \lambda = \paren {\lambda {\mathbf 1}_A - x}^{-1}$
Then $R$ is analytic with derivative:
- $\map {R'} \lambda = -\paren {\lambda {\mathbf 1}_A - x}^{-2}$
Although this article appears correct, it's inelegant. There has to be a better way of doing it. In particular: Derivative is not defined for complex domain You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by redesigning it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Improve}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |
Proof
If $B=\set {\mathbf 0_B}$, the statement is trivial, since $\map f z = \mathbf 0_{\map \LL {B, B}}$ for all $z \in \C$.
We assume that $B \ne \set {\mathbf 0_B}$.
Especially, for all $z \in \map \rho T$:
- $\map f z \ne \mathbf 0_{\map \LL {B, B}}$
since:
- $\paren {T - z I} \map f z = I \ne \mathbf 0_{\map \LL {B, B}}$
Let $a \in \map \rho T$.
Then for each $z \in \C$:
\(\ds T - z I\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {T - a I - \paren {z - a} I}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {T - a I} \paren {I - \paren {z - a} \paren {T - a I}^{-1} }\) | ||||||||||||
\(\text {(1)}: \quad\) | \(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {T - a I} \paren {I - \paren {z - a} \map f a}\) |
Recall that $\map B {c, r}$ denotes the open disc of center $c \in \C$ and radius $r>0$.
For all $z \in \map B {a, \frac{1}{\norm {\map f a} } }$, we have:
\(\ds \paren {I - \paren {z - a} \map f a}^{-1}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sum_{n \mathop \ge 0} \paren {\paren {z - a} \map f a}^n\) | Neumann Series, as $\norm {\paren {z - a} \map f a} < 1$ | |||||||||||
\(\text {(2)}: \quad\) | \(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sum_{n \mathop \ge 0} \paren {\map f a}^n \paren {z - a}^n\) |
Therefore:
\(\ds \paren {T - zI}^{-1}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {\paren {T - a I} \paren {I - \paren {z - a} \map f a} }^{-1}\) | by $(1)$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {I - \paren {z - a} \map f a}^{-1} \paren {T - a I}^{-1}\) | Inverse of Product | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {I - \paren {z - a} \map f a}^{-1} \map f a\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {\sum_{n \mathop \ge 0} \paren {\map f a}^n \paren {z - a}^n} \map f a\) | by $(2)$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sum_{n \mathop \ge 0} \paren {\map f a}^{n+1} \paren {z - a}^n\) |
That is, in a neighborhood of each $a \in \map \rho T$, $f$ can be written as:
- $\ds \map f z = \sum_{n \mathop \ge 0} \paren {\map f a}^{n+1} \paren {z - a}^n$
This means that $f$ is analytic on $\map \rho T$.
Finally, by Derivative of Power Series, in the neighborhood of each $a \in \map \rho T$:
- $\ds \map {f'} z = \sum_{n \mathop \ge 1} \paren {\map f a}^{n+1} n \paren {z - a}^{n-1}$
Choosing $z = a$, we obtain:
- $\map {f'} a = \paren {\map f a}^2 = \paren {T - aI}^{-2}$
$\blacksquare$