Smullyan's Drinking Principle/Paradoxical Aspects
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Paradoxical Aspects to Smullyan's Drinking Principle
Smullyan's Drinking Principle is often considered to be a counter-intuitive result.
Hence it is often classified as a veridical paradox.
However, it can be resolved by analyzing the possible scenarios.
The semi-formal proof attempts to do just that.
Thus, a careful analysis of the possible scenarios, as well as certain Paradoxes of Material Implication, show this to be a veridical paradox.
Note that this is a theorem for arbitrary non-empty universes of discourse and arbitrary propositional functions $\map D x$.
So this theorem is valid for all interpretations of $\map D x$.
For example:
- let the universe of discourse be the objects in Philadelphia
- let $\map D x$ mean:
- $x$ is a dog
- Then there exists something in Philadelphia such that, if it is a dog, then everything in Philadelphia is a dog.
Source of Name
This entry was named for Raymond Merrill Smullyan.